How Much Does Lighterlife Cost In January 2009?

"Silencing the gossip"

"What fly could well have bitten a Roman Bernard? This young blogger has published a rather scathing about Free forum and its associations. [...] "

(Source)

Hannah Montana Insulin Pump Pouch

Belgium : Ban on speaking French in the periphery of the "capital of Europe" They

Or how the humorist François Pirette trapped the Flemish municipality of Dilbeek (video)


Quiévrain you know? No? Me either. After verification, it is a city of strong Walloon few thousand people located on the Franco-Belgian border that I have never ceased to regard as perfectly inept.

When some Belgian, the "belgolâtres, finally, in short, supporters (mostly French) of a supposed" homeland Belgian, created from scratch in 1830 to meet financial and strategic interests of London and some local French bourgeoisie, want to stand out from France, they evoke a country located "off-Quiévrain," just as one would say, for example, in Germany, with the difference that the Rhine on the map of Europe is something, whereas Quiévrain resembles a corn barely findable on a map of Belgium. We have the references that you can.

Speaking Rhine besides, I Having a good eye, I think the French border remain on its entire shoreline. Bonapartist? Why not! For me, June 18, 1815, in Waterloo, we knew a defeat, a disaster, more than ever, I proclaims "Long live the Emperor!

course, but all that you say, it's over, finished, forgotten, in the dustbin of history. First, dear Sir, have you seen the mess that we are in Europe, in the West, in the world? And aim a little state of France, eh, not Folichon, you agree? I agree, I agree ...! And you might want to try to flog us the extra Wallonia and Brussels this city who are known to be seriously impoverished areas and not in the least dynamic economic standpoint, sinkholes, barrels of Danaides, assisted the eternal, the eater of European aid, which barely paid, disappear like snow in the sun, engulfed in projects as megalomaniacal as useless, as your station of Liege, where, completely insane, you have an airport frame, not a station railroad, no! And where, I ask you? Somewhere on the Meuse, lost nowhere in the former Germania Inferior! Regardless, I grant you!

I also try not to slip you my junk, nay! A supporter of annexation to France of all municipalities in Belgium largely francophone, my faith, I have been. I'm even. At least theoretically. Well yes you still see France, in the state that is his, and even though it would be worth some effort, engage in adventure a review of border? No, and certainly not with Kouchner, much more concerned about Africa and the Caribbean. In addition, the state of disrepair of Brussels and Wallonia, with their average 20% unemployment, will quickly convince you that these are gifts poisoned well. Assistantship, yet the assistantship, I yelled to one ear, we do not want! Yes, okay, I understand ...!

But so what, sir, you're not Belgian you do not vibrate with the accents of the Belgian national anthem, you do not venerate the flag and point the Belgian monarchy? That's it, you've got it! I'm from Belgium that it yad'écrit on my ID, nothing more! Ha but what are you then? Gallic, ladies and gentlemen, perfectly! Community reference strain pure and absolutely no nationalist or regionalist! Gallic, that is to say Western language and culture French compatriot all Westerners language and French culture, whether in Quebec or Romandie, Brussels or Picardy, Paris or Wallonia! I must speak to you one day approach "communitarian" as understood "Quiévrain overseas, but this is not my purpose today, it would take us too far.

But say so, incorrigible uncivil, we at least tell you where you got this rejection so tough that no believe, obviously naively, be your national homeland? Ha there for you to understand me and that you understand the video delirious surrealism to follow, must still I will explain the maelstrom in which we live, "Quiévrain overseas." I'll try not to long not to get drunk with our fundamental nonsense, it will not be easy, as you know. "

Belgium is a federal state composed of three regions (Brussels Capital Region, Wallonia, Flanders) and three communities (French, Dutch, Communities). The French community (because yes, it is called so), unites the Francophone Wallonia and Brussels, the Flemish community gathers Dutch-speaking Flanders and Brussels; speaking community consists of 60 000 germanophones in eastern Wallonia, on the side of Eupen and Malmedy. Ok, you always follow?

At the heart of this geopolitical bent, there Brussels. You'll notice that the two main communities in Belgium are represented in this region that appears as the only French-Dutch bilingual region of the Belgian State. And that is where the Romans grapple. The region of Brussels also composed of 19 separate municipalities, were 85% francophone and 15% of Dutch (although immigration and the presence of many Eurocrats dramatically changed the demographics of the city, but is, I simplify, if you don ' anything more will understand).

The territory of the Brussels region is an enclave within the territory which is administratively Flanders. In other words, out of Brussels, you must necessarily pass through the Flemish territory. Where the hell is the problem, you say, it is still not in the West Berlin of the "Cold War"! No, certainly not altogether happily, but there is a bit of that anyway, because here's the problem.

Flanders believes that the Brussels area historically belongs to it and even its capital. By contrast, Brussels, who are among a minority of them Dutch, consider, or that Brussels is entitled to their autonomy, particularly as "capital of Europe" or that it belongs in fact to Francophonie and has nothing to do in Flanders. In response to annexationist Flemish and Brussels also claim the right to extend their city to surrounding towns, Flemish administration, but some of which are inhabited by many French, sometimes overwhelmingly (eg the town of Linkebeek) . For your information, know that the outskirts of Brussels has nothing in common with some French suburbs "sensitive" but are, rather, an oasis of prosperous bourgeoisie.

To Complicating this picture entangled, be aware that some common Flemish Francophone devices (six in all) were given the "linguistic facilities". They are however widely questioned by Flanders today who fear, above all, the extension of Brussels and the French-speaking populations on its territory. Also, to curb what it sees as a threat to its cultural survival, Flanders tent does prohibit the use of French within its territory, particularly in the communes of the Brussels periphery, resulting , one suspects, to situations as qu'ubuesques burlesque.

Some will say that I can not exaggerate, we can not have the crazy idea to install the "capital of Europe" (I emphasize the quotes because it is obviously that the capital of the 'Euromarket ", better known as surreal as" EU ") in such a beet field, all it seems quite fanciful. Much more than you think, believe me, supporting evidence.

Among the Flemish communes around Brussels the fiercest to stem the march of the French language, we find the common Dilbeek. However, a few days ago, comedian and impersonator Walloon Pirette François, trapped by telephone this county officials, posing as a diplomat for Africa, settled in Paris, a unilingual Francophone and anxious to find a colleague, a housing in the territory of the municipality of Dilbeek.

Here's the video. Judge for yourself delirium. Have fun!

Pirette: ban on speaking French in Flanders selected and Sketch Comedy / Imitation

Like what, the reality often surpasses fiction, and Michel Colucci, the son of an Italian emigrant named Honorio Colucci, this Coluche So, who popularized the "Belgian jokes" imitating accent badly Brussels (not Belgian) that he hardly knew, had perhaps not as much imagination and originality that has said.

To learn more about a subject, nothing like that to go back to its source: I have just demonstrated.

Eric Timmermans, Brussels

Watch Online Movies Free

Free, they are all accomplices?

With the award of the fourth mobile license to Free e-sprits web warmed up: "Finally, an operator who will respect its customers! And yet, if you look closely, you can ask a few questions: the great community of Free is so independent as she claims? Its zealots have they played a role in the award of the fourth license to the new entrant and, if so, which? Finally, Free would have something to hide from its prospective clients when he moves well hidden ?

Rudolph

you know Rudolph ? It is the emblematic figure of Free, which has more than 400,000 fans on his Facebook page. Become a customer at Free is therefore becoming friends with Rudolph and go into a great community that has many associations with many people to help you when you have a problem with freebox your ... But look at what lies behind this pretty facade.

Independence?

In an article in the Nouvel Observateur on "volunteers Free" , we read that Xavier Niel pampers its associations because, says the journalist, " [i] the long understood that it was also what allowed the company to have advertising costs minimized. "This quote the penny dropped: is it possible that Free exploits the members of his community? Yet, if we made the turn, the two words that seem to put "independence" and "volunteer."

The newsletters' too subjective "

Aduf : this acronym hides behind the association of users of Free, association can not be closer to Xavier Niel, since it has chosen domicile of its registered office at 8, rue de la Ville l'Eveque (Paris 8 e), which is nothing but ... address Free . In fact, Aduf was created by employees and directors of Free. Angélique Berge is both patron and leader of the Aduf society Centrapel , a subsidiary of the Iliad, the parent company. Among the founding members of this association, five work at Free. But if Free does not hide from this proximity, it may have astonishing consequences: for example, in January 2006, the team that hosted the forum slammed the door denouncing an association which took not sufficiently consider the interests of Free users and send newsletters "too subjective . While some associations seem clearly independent, as the Consumers' Association Freek, one may ask questions to others such as Freenews, very visible on the site and whose founder Aduf Olivier Rosello is also a founding member of Aduf.

"Tentacle"

If you can not blame Free to have surrounded himself with hybrid communities, it is doubtful whether this business model is sound. Free for why he enjoys and to use the Internet? The UFC-Que Choisir had already denounced the false forum Aduf noting that according to Article 18 of the bylaws of the association, "Iliad serves on the board of the Aduf " and" respects the freedom of decision "and " freedom of action " At least "so that these freedoms are not contrary to the interests of Iliad. " Also, many surfers have been attacked by Free. Simply go to the forum " Pursued by free.fr - Do not panic " to realize the unclear role played by Aduf to internet. Thus, as pointed a member of this forum , one of the reasons that created the Free Aduf is this: " [l] he third is that which corresponds most to the spirit of the Iliad. The creation of an additional tentacle, using the window of a respectable organization "Act 1901". This strategy would be to occupy a space before it is filled by another association. It is better to manage yourself unhappy customers rather than letting others do it or worse, seeing them together in a genuine partnership. " Also, it seems that Aduf have the libel easy including Free users who do attempts at humor .

A little transparency

While Free will return very soon in the closed universe of mobile telephony could expect from him a little more transparency. Indeed, how can we be credible if we know that the community of users is handled by a pseudo-association with forums cans? How can we trust the new operator says it will revolutionize the world and practices of telephone moving to France if you can not already do not trust the provider who is willing to discuss with users on the forums, except when they begin to speak ill of him? This is a whole series of questions to which you must answer that Free.


Roman Bernard

Dr. Arvind Poswalishrs

No society with no tradition

Thank Amel.

[T] o nineteenth century, taking a position [...] consciously against tradition and innovation radical liberal ideology of social change has systematically failed to establish social ties and authority taken for granted in earlier societies, and has thus created gaps [. ..].

Eric Hobsbawm, The Invention of Tradition (1983)

Drawing Cubes In Illustrator

All roads lead to Medina

Train: Bertrand space for "women"

The secretary general of the UMP, Xavier Bertrand, argues in one Daily care Metro for "Space in commuter trains" reserved for women, a proposal that the UMP has francilienne controversy earlier in the season.

"If we speak [security] during these elections, because the region has a significant power of decision in the matter" says Xavier Bertrand, who takes up the controversial proposal to list the head of UMP Seine-Saint-Denis, the police officer Bruno Beschizza. This "to reserve a space in commuter trains in which women would be better protected" , said Xavier Bertrand. "It was humorous observers, but not the women involved" , he adds.

"Security is a priority not only for the UMP: it is a priority for all the French" , he insists, recalling a proposal flagship program of the majority of these local organizations, the widespread use of video surveillance in railway stations, transport and near schools.

(Source)

So on behalf of the legitimate protection of women's safety as the leader of "conservative" proposes to satisfy a claim of Islamists: the separation of men and women in public space. This type of attitude has a name.

Dhimmitude.

Sayings To Put On Baby Shower Cake

Debate on Islam: not mix xenophobic nor candor "islamolâtre" by Eric Timmermans

"The battle against the Islamic veil is only the beginning of open war against the fundamentalists, whose outcome will depend on our ability to disqualify them from public institutions, including school. If we lose this round, Islam will emerge stronger and more assertive. "

( My life against the Koran - A woman testifying against the Islamists , Djemila Benhabib, VLB éditeur, 2009, p. 78).

For the international press coverage devoted to Jihad and militant Islam, which will be published following this section in the coming weeks, we wanted to get out of the usual Manichean straitjacket of confrontation "Jihad vs. McWorld , which tends to dominate the debate on Islam in Western societies, and we also wanted to demonstrate that the problem posed by Islam, for Islam ideology, therefore, that whether or not violent in nature, not limited to an opposition, real or supposed, between two civilizations, but is in fact a universal problem.

So we wanted to make a tour of various topical civilizational fault lines on which Islam ideologically opposed, with violence or not, other beliefs and philosophies, whether Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist or atheist. It is therefore, not to demonize Islam as a religion as personal belief, as individual spiritual journey as a mystic, but rather to highlight the universal threat posed by political manipulation and / or military of this religion for all free thinkers, atheists, believers, as well as for the followers of other religions and beliefs of this planet.

We will not deal, in our press review, the issue of intra-Muslim conflict, nor that of major international issues of the moment, Afghan, Pakistani, Iranian or Iraqi, or very briefly, about a Details of these situations which, in total, each worth more than a sacroiliac joint. We also refused to give us a body count of these conflicts, like an official press which seems to have raised these calculations to the level of morbid substitute for deep and permanent geopolitical analysis that should be the standard in the quality press, as was already the case, there are now more than twenty years, before the imposition the reign of the "politically correct" and info " people" and "proximity".

Islam is to Christianity, one of the two major religions proselytes of our universe. Admittedly, my retort is, but should nevertheless make many distinctions between Islam and Christianity. We doubt not, I reply, but we will not, however, we engage in this debate because this is not the purpose of this press release. Suffice it to note that it is necessary to distinguish religions proselytes, first, that Islam is by far the most active today, religions rooted , on the other hand, who do no (or little) the conversion, such as Judaism and Hinduism. In this very schematic picture of the universal religious landscape, Buddhism has a special place. Although a universal, just as Islam and Christianity, Buddhism does not practice aggressive proselytizing, from the standpoint of Buddhist doctrine, it would also make sense. We exclude these remarks obviously sectarian countless more or less marginal.

So now we have to specifically designate Islam as a religion of universal and therefore as a proselytizing religion, which seeks to convert and extend to non-Muslims, are we entitled to consider the Islam as a religion fundamentally expansionist? Of course. Islam, or if you prefer Islamism, that is to say, the ideological form of Islam today evidence of expansionism as Christianity once did - and still today in some form elsewhere - in colonial times, for example, where the process of evangelization of the heathen polytheists in Europe. This is an undeniable historical reality.

In every religion, it must nevertheless distinguish two fundamental aspects: the spiritual and philosophical dimension. And Islam is no exception. The first is a personal reflection on the place of human beings in the universe, about death, about life, about the why of existence, is located on a metaphysical plane and corresponds to a personal and self governed exclusively by the private sphere. The second, by cons, located clearly on a physical, material, and is not intended to approach the individual spiritual but political control, the temporal power, domination and enslavement of others, the global expansionism, the penetration of the public sphere, a priori open to all, by a single religious form presented as the sole holder of the Supreme Truth.

In Islam the term jihad in the West we associate now exclusively, but partly incorrectly to the concept of "holy war" to distinguish these two approaches, individually or expansionist religion. Originally, the word jihad actually means "effort" and even more accurately "self-effort." According to Muhammad himself, the true "warrior" who is fighting to book himself and his own through to an improvement in the way of God is al-Jihad al-Akbar , c that is to say the "Great War" introspective. But the fact remains that today, this approach is arduous jihad largely obscured by al-Jihad al -Asghar , war in the literal sense of the term, coupled with an avowed intention of proselytizing or unacknowledged, that is to say "holy war": it is obviously easier to feel good and claim to be superior in condemning and trying to enslave others than to engage in a profound criticism of his innermost being. It goes without saying that in the context of this press release, we use the term jihad and "Jihadism" in their acceptance militaristic, political and petty, and not that of an inner spiritual journey worthwhile. (Info.it: Dictionary of Muslim symbols , Malek Chebel, Albin Michel, 1995 140).

The West makes the mistake of wanting to distinguish a "moderate Islam" of a "radical Islam", when it should distinguish Islam spiritual oriented strictly personal and introspective, that of al-Jihad al -Akbar, an Islamic ideological proselytizing and dominating that of al-Jihad al -Asghar , serving the public, political, social and temporal too. It may seem "moderate" and work actively towards a company wholly governed by Islamic law, just as one can be "radical" in practice, for example, severe asceticism strictly individual and based on the precepts of the Koran. The term "Islamism" should not be used to refer to "radical Islam", a term vague and imprecise, but ideological Islam in all its forms, even apparently moderate, which, encroaching on the area of public sphere is, in the context of the separation of temporal and spiritual powers, obviously not compatible with the Western tradition.

In this regard, I would also like to indulge in a small digression. Recently, during an evening, we were a few to mention the risk of drift towards totalitarianism may come from any political power and any ideology. I said that democracy did not escape the danger of this kind of drift and we could even see in "group think" in the "politically correct", the premise of a certain totalitarian drift. It replied that it could be because in our democracies nothing could be compared to the violence that characterized the totalitarian communist and Nazi, for example. This confuses the means and purpose. What characterizes totalitarianism is not violence, it is only a means and not an end in itself, but the will to control minds. The totalitarian regime who successfully win without violence would be no less totalitarian. And we must remember that in our fight against Islamism, What characterizes it is not the physical or verbal abuse but his desire to win without sharing, including the appearance of moderation and dialogue.

After making an initial distinction between religions proselytes and religions rooted , and after distinguishing what in religion, and in this case in the Islamic religion is the spiritual approach individual Islamic and what is temporal Islamist proselytizing, we now face several different forms of Islam ideology. In terms of Islam caliphates , it means the willingness of Islamist universal expansion and, specifically, the Islamist project of establishing a "universal caliphate." By the terms of jihadist Islam we designate the excesses of militarism and Islamic terrorists. In terms of political Islam denotes, of course, actions Islamists to seize political power, which is not compatible, we repeat, with the Western rule of separation of temporal and spiritual powers . By the terms of the militant Islam means the Islamist desire to encroach on the public sphere, not only from a political standpoint, but also by using economic, financial, social, associative, culture.

So it's not for us to call the crusade against Islam as a spiritual choice freely made - and we insist on these terms which obviously excludes any form of arbitrary imposition of a religious individual, man or woman, living on the floor of West, and that whatever its origin - and as individual religious approach, but to reject and fight Islamism as a political ideology proselyte.

In this regard, note that the Islamists have succeeded in subtly, by now common terms of "Islamophobic" and "Islamophobia," to create confusion between the notions of xenophobia anti-Muslim - we can not talk about "racism" in the case of a religious affiliation - and criticism of Islam as a political ideology: while rejecting Islam as ideological and religious truth would be an undeniable "Islamophobic" who hates all Muslims. This shotgun approach is also widely propagated by certain political and social circles, particularly rooted to the left of the political spectrum and demonstrating high level of a foolish candor "islamolâtre," it does nothing for a better understanding of Islamic spirituality, but by doing cons clear the bed of Islamic proselytizing. Must specify in their policy choices, these people, throughout history, have never ceased to be wrong?

From the point of view of the right to freedom of expression prevalent in the West, any religion, especially when it argued in an illegitimate way to a social and political role, is obviously open to criticism. It is therefore not to stigmatize or condemn those who wish to criticize Islam, much less to accept that they are. Clearly, what is said, written and drawn about, for example, the Catholic Church must also be said, written and drawn about Islam. If this bothers some freedom of speech, faith, we strongly advise them to go in search of heaven to them warmer. If anti-Muslim xenophobia, that is to say the release of a person solely because of his religious affiliation - dare I say, to designate use of the neologism "muslimophobie? - Is obviously wrong, anti-Islamism, it is to say, the ideological rejection of Islam, is perfectly legitimate in a democratic context. The concept of "Islamophobia" which establishes a dangerous confusion between these two concepts must itself by cons, be absolutely abandoned.

We are not fighting the Muslim peoples, or the Islamic spiritual journey, but a political ideology, Islamism, absolutely incompatible with Western notions of separation of temporal and spiritual powers, and with freedom of expression dearly acquired during struggles through the centuries, other cons obscurantism. And it goes without saying that we are in solidarity with other peoples, other cultures, other civilizations and Muslims themselves, as well as Muslims who have made the choice to turn away from Islam, engaged in that battle. That is what we are trying to express in this press release.

Eric Timmermans


An information relaying, a forthcoming paper to publish exclusively on Criticus? Feel free to send me news and forums at the following address: criticusleblog@gmail.com .

To support Criticus:

Your donations will be fully spent on Criticus of advertising space on Google AdWords and Facebook. I promise.