Below is an article by Gustave Reuben
The France of today. Its miscegenation, its diversity, multiculturalism. I am one of his mixed race. So cons myself that I react to the political ideology of miscegenation, which seems to be dangerous. One way to think against itself, as we has learned Cioran (1) to understand the fanaticism that comes in his own home.
Ideally extremist likes to appear to face Angel. It is to defend that awful outlook for too consistent to the spirit of an era, to its evolution as a desired fashion, his credulity and innocence, seem wonderful to those who defend them. Mutation of a paradoxical society becomes the devil she believed banning. A
ambition dominant ideology, that of miscegenation, or conversely, diversity, advocates a biological model. What's more organic, in fact, that the concepts of miscegenation or racial diversity?
Miscegenation and diversity today have that amount of supporters able to defend this new biological model above, though they make little account of what they work, that the intoxication of such a struggle just to the convincing.
is a habit, scientists, below all, eager to prove how the blending is scientifically better (eugenics) due to the increased diversity of the genetic heritage, as they once flocked to demonstrate scientifically the white man, or Aryan, was higher, as they have repeatedly proven, scientifically, the dominant political ideology, repeatedly defended the biological model was higher than that ideology. Common feature of these two opposing models, their promoters have the belief that their model generates a higher culture, today's multicultural society.
All this is very silly. The white man, black man, the man of mixed race, are not superior in principle, they are if they show, they perform feats indisputable in all areas. What will such a man is superior, culturally, economically, militarily or morally, not race, but his determination to realize his ambition. Diversity can not be superior in principle, because nothing gives any privilege, and if it is known as a success, it is clear that the model fanatics eager to discern its truth - because their Judgement, merit is no longer at work, but the union of the genes.
In a society that is unjust to men and women whose own ancestors were victims of history, modern man wants to prove that the mestizo is undoubtedly higher, which is foolish, since it can be demonstrated by the supposed superiority.
Modern man has to prove to heart what he believes to prove in advance.
Following the model emerging, which probably will prevail eventually, reality will soon be sensitive tolerable than diverse, the reality will be "diverse" in its entirety last be compatible with the new model, fully comply with the unprecedented organic standard. Self-preservation and selection Sexual lead individuals to follow them to be preserved.
It seems to me that any racial aesthetics is inherently dangerous, and upon reflection, this aesthetic of mixing or diversity is no exception to the rule. Miscegenation or diversity are in no danger (any more than being white or black, or living between whites and blacks), but monstrous is its transformation into a political ideology promising a company that believes itself biologically and culturally superior only because of its biology or its ethnic composition. Any defense
diversity policy or miscegenation is also self-contradictory: it implies the rejection of a little too diverse to France please.
1) Cioran, The Temptation to exist , Paris, Gallimard (coll. "Ideas"), 1974, p. 11: "The mind, as well as the body, the brunt of the" intense life ". Mastered the art of thinking against oneself, Nietzsche, Baudelaire and Dostoyevsky we have learned to rely on our own, expand the sphere of our troubles, gain of existence by the division of our being. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment