All is not also relevant in this text 1985, either in substance or form, but Guy-Ernest at least has the advantage for him to take the issue through the proper end, logically and chronologically. So if you do not mind, I encourage you to read what he wrote here in 25 years:
"Everything is wrong in the" immigrant question ", just as in any open question in the present society and for the same reasons: the economy - that is to say the illusion pseudo-economic - has been made, and the show was treated.
We discussed only nonsense. Should we keep or remove immigrants? (Of course, the true immigrant is not the permanent resident of foreign origin, but one that is perceived and perceives itself as different and intended to stay. Many immigrants or their children had French nationality, many Poles or Spaniards are finally lost in the mass of a French population was different. As the waste from the nuclear industry or oil into the ocean - and there are slower and less defined "scientifically "The threshold of intolerance - migrants, products from the same management of modern capitalism, will remain for centuries, millennia, always. They remain because it was much easier to eliminate the Jews of Germany in Hitler's time that the North Africans, and others, by far: in France because there is neither a party nor the Nazi myth a native breed!
Must assimilate or "respect for cultural diversity"? Inept false choice. We can no longer assimilate anyone: neither youth nor the French workers, or even the provincial and old minorities Ethnic (Corsicans, Bretons, etc.). because Paris, a city destroyed , has lost its historical role was to the French. What a centralism without capital? The concentration camp has not created any German deportees among Europeans. The distribution of the show focused not be made uniform as spectators.
It revels in simple language advertising, the rich expression of "cultural diversity". Which crops? There are more. Neither Christian nor Muslim, neither socialist nor scientistic. Do not talk about absent. There is more to watch a moment of truth and evidence, that the dramatic deterioration-World (U.S.) of any culture.
This is definitely not voting for that one assimilates. Historical demonstration that the vote is nothing, even for the French, who are voters and are nothing (1 party = 1 other party, a campaign promise = its opposite;
and more recently a program - which everybody knows that it will not be required - moreover finally ceased to be disappointing, since he never contemplated any significant problems. Who voted into the disappearance of bread?).
We recently confessed that figure reveals (And probably manipulated down): 25% of the "citizens" of the age group 18-25 years are not registered on electoral lists, simply by disgust. Abstainers are others that are added.
Some put forward the criterion of "speaking French." Laughable. The French are they talking about the present? Is the French spoken by the illiterate today, or Fabius ("Hello trouble!") Or Françoise Castro ("It lives you or t'effleure it?"), Or BH Levy? Will not it not clear, even if there were no immigrants, to the loss of any language and any articulated reasoning? What songs play this youth? What
sects infinitely more ridiculous than Islam and Catholicism have easily won an allowance on a proportion of educated idiots contemporaries (Moon, etc..)? Not to mention the severely retarded or autistic that such cults do not recruit because there is no economic interest in exploiting these cattle: therefore it is left in charge to the government.
We made America. It is normal that we find here all the miserable problems of the U.S., the drug mafia, fast-food proliferation of ethnic groups. For example, Italy and Spain, Americanized surface and even at a considerable depth, are not ethnically mixed.
In this sense, they remain more widely in Europe (as is AIgérie North Africa). We have here the troubles of America without having the strength. It is not clear that the American melting pot still works long (eg with Chicanos who have another language). But he is quite sure he can not work here any time. Because that's what the U.S. manufacturing center mode current life, the heart of the show that extends its pulsations to Moscow or Beijing, and which in any case can not allow any independence to its local subcontractors (the understanding of this unfortunately shows a subjection much less superficial than that would destroy or moderate the usual critics "imperialism").
Here, we do nothing: the colonized who failed revolt, the yes-man of spectacular alienation. What claim, considering the presence of proliferative immigrants of all colors, find ourselves suddenly in France, as if we steal something that is still with us? And what then? What we believe, or rather what do we still pretend? It is a pride for their rare holidays, when the pure slaves indignant that metics threaten their independence!
The risk of apartheid? It is real. It is more a risk, it is inevitable there already (with its logic of ghettos, racial clashes, and a day of bloodshed). A society that is completely broken obviously less able to accommodate without too many problems a large amount of immigrants that could be a cohesive society and relatively happy. We have already noted in 1973 that striking the balance between technological developments and changing attitudes: "The environment is ever more hastily rebuilt to the repressive control and profit at the same time becomes more fragile and encourages more vandalism. Capitalism in its spectacular stage while rebuilding and producing fake incendiary. And its decoration is everywhere as flammable College de France. "
With the presence of immigrants (who has already served some unionists may denounce as" war religions "some workers' strikes they could not control), we can be assured that the existing authorities will promote development of small-scale experiments that we have seen clashes staged through" terrorists " real or fake, or supporters of rival football teams (not just English supporters).
But it's clear why all political leaders (including leaders of the National Front) have sought to downplay the seriousness of the "immigrant problem". All they want to keep all their allowed to watch one problem in the face and in its proper context. Some pretend that it's only a matter of "goodwill anti-racist" to enforce, and others that he comes to recognize the rights of a moderate "just xenophobia."
And all work together to consider this issue as if it was the hottest, almost alone among all the frightening problems that a company does not overcome. The new apartheid ghetto spectacular (not the local version, folk, South Africa), it is already there, in France today: the vast majority the population is trapped and brutalized, and all must have been the same had it not been a single immigrant. Who decided to build and Minguettes Sarcelles, destroy Paris or Lyon? We certainly can not say no immigrant has participated in this infamous work. But they have only obeyed strictly the orders given to them: this is the usual misfortune of wage labor.
How many foreigners it actually in France? (And not just the legal status, color, facies.) It is obvious that there are so many that we should rather ask: how is he French and where are they? (And what characterizes a French now?) How would it soon, French? We know that fertility decline. Is not that normal? The French can no longer bear their children. They send them to school at three years, and at least sixteen, to teach literacy. And before they have three years, more and more people who are "unbearable" and hit more or less violently. Children are still loved in Spain, Italy, Algeria, among Gypsies.
Not often in France now. Neither housing nor the city are no longer made for children (hence the cynical publicity of government planners on "open city on children"). On the other hand, contraception is widespread, abortion is free. Almost all children today in France, have been desired. But not free! The voter-consumer does not know what he wants. He "chose" something he dislikes. Her mental structure that has more coherence to remember that he wanted something, when he found himself disappointed by the experience of this very thing.
In the show, a company class wanted, very systematically, eliminating history. And now it claims to regret this one particular result of the presence of so many immigrants, because France will "disappear" as well? Comic. She disappears for many other causes and, more or less rapidly on almost any terrain.
Immigrants have the best right to live in France. They are representatives of the dispossession and deprivation is at home in France, as she has a majority. and almost universal. Immigrants have lost their culture and country, very known, but could not find others. And the French are in the same case, and just as secretly.
With equalization of the entire planet in the misery of a new environment and intelligence of all purely false, the French. who accepted it without much rebellion (except 1968) are ill advised to say they feel more at home because of immigrants! They have every reason not to feel at home, it's very true. This is because there is nobody else in this horrible new world of alienation, that of immigrants. It
people live on the surface of the earth, and here, when the France will be gone. The ethnic mix that will dominate is unpredictable, as their cultures, their languages themselves. Arguably, the central issue, deeply qualitative, will be this: will these future peoples they dominated, by a practice emancipated, the present technique, which is generally that of the sham and dispossession? Or, conversely, will they be dominated by it in an even more hierarchical and slavery today? We must assume the worst, and fight for the best. France is certainly regrettable. But regrets are vain. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment