A bit of everything today. The world itself is increasingly disjointed, so why not me or my writing, from time to time .
I cited this sentence J.-P. Voyer, who had scored first blessed reading where the teacher said in substance that the very fact that a guy like it can not but be aware of the existence of a type as BHL proved that the world was going badly. Twenty-five years later, that someone like me could occasionally - not often, but not exceptional either - find themselves in agreement with someone like I. Rioufol , which represents almost everything I hate, perhaps, and though the very fact that the accession of that motherfucker in a public forum is not a good sign, perhaps, paradoxically, a sign positive, even very small: a bastard who preaches and division and separation, is found to state a few truths, although they must are becoming more visible ...
blogger qualitative di, di qualita , wrote to me after the first charge Alain Soral cons Marc-Edouard Nabe that many forum soraliens Net Nabe were attacking now, without asking questions about the validity of statements made by their Che. A few days ago, an academic who had sent a text I had written about him, lamenting that I should have "dragged through the mud," and even "killed", he says people do Based more on the Internet to form an opinion. There is pack, I am willing, on the net as much elsewhere, but it should qualify. In his biography of Daniel Halevy, Sebastien Laurent shows that when Halevy began to move away from his political left, it was soon difficult to write in the newspapers where he used to speak: soon he could no longer publish (ouch!) only through the inner circles of the French Action. Sébastien Laurent pointed out, drawing on similar remarks of F. Brayard in How the idea came to Mr. Rassinier (Fayard, 1996), that the same phenomenon occurred with the first denial, once removed from its original environment, the extreme left, which he remained all his life anti-colonialist, had no other choice, trying to make its revisionist arguments, but to have it published by the far right, with everything it involves views symbolic and concrete.
Presumably what one wants these demonstrations, and these examples, the fact remains that, at least for people who do not live by their pen, the Internet allows these sectarian logic. - Conversely moreover, those who, despite these new possibilities of non-allegiance to anyone but what they believe to be true, join anyway Sites ideologically tainted, may wonder what motivates them, as well as what the long term they may be at risk, these remarks from someone who does not like amalgam or those who make them. Having finished
The man who stopped writing , which I will describe very briefly generous book, both in the sense that we speak of a buxom woman, and because the author been generous, to his reader as in the case of most of his characters, I have a little depth the issue of conspiracy theories. Apart from the attack by Alain Soral already mentioned, here are the main evidence, to my knowledge, in terms of book Nabe:
- the response of the Free Thinker the portrait is made of him and objections submitted to him by MoE;
- study precise and convincing James Lawrence, mainly focused on the palimpsest of the Divine Comedy by Nabe, but which evokes these issues;
- the text that inspired the Free Thinker ;
- and finally the Lawrence James response.
This issue of conspiracy theories is important in that it intersects a purely political issue : who is the author of 11? where does the financial crisis?, etc.. The answer to each question of this kind is obviously rich with implications about the direction we are trying to give his fight, and a psychological question: average person, that I believe the world today? The Politics affects us all in some way, but it is dramatic in the sense that can and should be a theatrical and for those who are consciously engaged in a political struggle is the psychological aspect central for everyone - and everyone knows it - in our world ill-pleased. The two angles are also linked, since of course you can not wear the same look on the possibilities of confidence in what we hear if you come to the conclusion that 11 September is an American operation, or action of Al-Qaeda . In another sense, it is clear that in some cases - is one of about The man who stopped writing - that original suspicion that we would like to assimilate critical thinking but who will actually further, which is the source of the challenged official versions. This does not, conversely, some may hang on to these official versions for fear of having to ask too many questions if they gave up.
After noting in passing that the argument I used early 2009, also found in the book Nabe, that it is still surprising, if September 11 was a conspiracy, that 'None of those who attended, and that's not necessarily bad people, has felt the need, even if only to taste Warholian fifteen minutes of fame, to launch a stir on the Net - Free Thinker uses the statements of official figures Italian or Russian, or military members, but have not participated in the conspiracy - after noting that this argument not only remains valid but becomes a little more real every day that God does - while risking course to become brutally wrong ... - here are some modest diagnoses:
- I say this without citing specific examples, I made the mistake of listening to his reaction to the book without Nabe note on the moment the passages that seemed most characteristic, I will be more accurate if you ask me being: some formulations of the Free Thinker seem an intellectual cadaveric rigidity that gives full due to him as for others, how Nabe spoke silhouette in his latest book;
- especially in the center of this issue, there is the idea that "chance is the providence of Dunces": that famous sentence Bloy, known Nabe, the Free Thinker Lawrence James, and, probably, Soral, is open to varying interpretations, soft or hard . The interpretation hard is psychologically difficult to maintain - how not to sink into paranoia? - And dangerous operation of a Christian perspective: for God can be there is no chance - and yet it is far from obvious - but it is still the foundation of Christianity be wary of the desire to be like gods ;
- you answer me, probably with Guénon in support, that initiation is not made for dogs. I admit here, without irony, as soon I reach my threshold for incompetence, never having taken any initiation process. It does not seem so far unsuccessfully to cite once again So wrote Peter Boutang in 1946 in his Sartre is it possessed? :
"Nowhere better than in the works of Dostoyevsky, the opposition of contemplation and action has been updated. Contemplatives Dostoevsky live a loneliness that is moving into the other: the possessed assemble the contrary, they even form secret societies and transport in cities within their desert. The underground is a sign of possession, some form of secrecy is the inverse of demonic sacramental mystery. That threatened the cities are forced to organize their clandestine resistance, this is an effect of misfortune and defeat, and men can adapt ... but they expect that the revelation of their secret relationship to the country or the city, now that would be less serious if it was diabolical. " (La Table Ronde, 1950, pp. 59-60)
Boutang, who devoted his thesis to the Ontology secret, indicating that this topic had nothing for him in high school, was not I know esoteric. I do not pretend otherwise close the debate with this quote. But I think I have sufficiently clarified some ideas from my side to warn freethinkers on how thin the dividing line, especially when that, under the influence "of misfortune and defeat," we find ourselves forced to call the "underground resistance" against the Empire, the thinness of the dividing line between research and / or awareness of the existence of ancient divine mysteries, pagan or Christian (or other ..., well aware that the status of the mystery is not always the same), and possession paranoid and "demonic" .
What might be called semi-interpretation hard Bloy's sentence is not safe either. I am far from having jurisdiction to do so, but perhaps it would be useful to ask whether secret societies have tended, with modernity, to switch the "dark side" of this watershed. If modernity is born under the seal of distrust, it would certainly not incongruous that the older orders are gradually becoming the meetings, if not possessed, the less paranoid, convinced that they alone have reason. To remain among Catholics could thus study in this light that leads the evolution of the Knights Templar to Opus Dei through the Jesuits. Purposely selected examples among groups that actually took power, who know so that it can be - and who enjoy having.
is a track, I'll book. And I understand why in the making calls recurring in the twentieth century, the creation of secret elites - there are people like that at home or Abellio Caillois, for example - I've always been a little embarrassed. I'm not trying to put all the members of secret societies in the category of the possessed, just to get rid of them once and for all, I note that the remedy may not be far wrong, if not not feed him. And I think most, even if not exclusive elitist solution, the proposal of James Lawrence, to embody "our minds by the begetting of children beautiful, sensitive and intelligent - like mine! Virtue for example, the advertising ... which can also be found in the work of those who openly expose relationships occult, when we actually learn something, we agree.
- "The beast is not one piece (it has seven heads and ten horns), and St. John describes the same terrible fighting between its various incarnations: it is the Beast from the sea and the beast came from the earth devour Babylon in chapter XVII of the Apocalypse. The devil is the one that divides, for he himself is infinitely fragmented, " Lawrence James wrote, noting correctly that it is an important point of division between him and the Free Thinker. We find of course the ideas of this kind among the great novelists Catholics. It is used extensively in a book that I've talked a bit about two years ago, The hand of the devil Denis de Rougemont. I reject an eye on occasion. Note that if this particular book is based on the idea that Baudelaire "the best trick of the Devil is to persuade you that it does not exist", the idea is equally balanced, and by the same token, valid : a nice trick of the Devil returns to convince us of its eternal omnipotence has always and forever;
- this incision made, and since we have just mentioned Catholic novelists, why not see that there is confusion, at Alain Soral now between the "fools" mentioned by the formula of Leon Bloy and, dare I say, magnified by Bernanos, and "useful idiots" of the Stalinist orthodoxy ? J.-P. Voyer rightly evokes a "crisis of stalinite" in some recent outbursts of Alain Soral cons Nabe or Mélenchon JL. About Some Free Thinker, refusing to James Lawrence - or myself - can still doubt on Sept. 11, under the pretext that mistaking an important subject is an objective complicity with the Empire, are along the same lines. Let's be clear: I do not say anything about what happened on September 11, I do not think prior to the absence of any conspiracy, I believe fully that our time is filled (and even, well as I suggested above, one should ask, I agree with James Lawrence through this, if there were no more conspiracies now there are people who believe ... A useful idiot, idiot useful and a half!), I do not deny that the passivity of the mass can make it objective ally, to use another twist typical of Stalinist rhetoric, the Empire : It must simply be wary of the mindset that, under the guise of logic, firmness, courage - to hell is paved with good intentions - wants to send the idiots to the Gulag or PAL, as if being stupid is enough not a metaphysical point of view ...
- "A useful idiot, useful idiot and a half, I'm writing: one can, after witnessing the fights between MEN and Free Thinker on this topic, refer them back to back and criticize them in the resurgence of the old Sartrean argument, "Do not despair Billancourt. Knowing that there is despair, which is demotivating, September 11 by assigning the Arabs or Yanks, is an entirely secondary, which will only provide arguments easily reversible. This, incidentally, also weakens, a political point of view, position, criticized from a psychological point of view, the destroyers of the "objective allies". Whatever the truth about September 11th, this does not alter the basic trends: Americans are bastards, with tremendous power, but they are losing. To what extent will they lose and how long, I'm not a soothsayer. It is certain that they would risk losing more and more quickly if it were to be proved to the world they are responsible for Sept. 11. But whatever wants to believe the Free Thinker, we're not there - and it does not, fortunately, and as he rightly points out, the Iraqi resistance to weaken the invader;
- to be noticed pass it all the more regrettable that Alain Soral lets himself be dominated by Manichean impulses and Stalin, he is also benevolent and sometimes a little too much about the weaknesses and errors of men of the past. The hand of the devil probably ...
- I take this opportunity to squeeze it, it's been months since I seek an opportunity, I was struck by the fact that the Soral same reasoning vis-à-vis immigrants is similar to the one I used when opening or almost my coffee on the "Israeli-Palestinian conflict" we did not create the desired or situation, but all try to resolve it as peacefully as possible, between people of good will ...
- ... and I find on the subject. It may be that the Free Thinker and Soral are right on September 11 and that this will ever be proven. Nothing authorizes, however, and nothing will allow retrospect should this be shown to excommunicate those who disagree with them. If it turns they understood better than Nabe what happened that day, it would be to their credit. However, views psychological and metaphysical - assuming we can separate them - their position seems less rich, less human than Nabe, Lawrence James - or, it makes sense to me to include, bibi.
should extend from the side of sex these reflections, I have things to add to what James Lawrence writes, perhaps it would be interesting to link the issue of prostitution in all this ... I'll stop there and, as with Brel, "I still talk about me" by telling you to finish this dream two nights ago. Obviously, you have my word ...
I was in a bus, I am accosted by a charming young lady of 25 years or so, divine smile, chest fullness of a fluid. We talk, I feel a relative attraction to her, but without much flame. We continue our journey in a cab now, she looks at me, always with that smile sublime, and told me she thinks I left. I do not answer, she says, for her, she is ... I find it at the same time, "extreme right" and illico replied "Me too!" : It is this conceptual agreement, this nascent harmony, which makes me really want to kiss let me do it with pleasure as obvious enjoyable for my ego
... No comment!
PS: I discovered at the time of writing this video was put online without source Equality and Reconciliation. Anything that can help feed the truth is good to take, yawohl, but do not fall into simplistic exactly opposite to the doxa : it says here that Eric Zemmour, based on books by Simon Epstein is true, but is abstract - it's all Zemmour: get people interested in facts unexpected, but the Schematically sometimes limit the truth-cons - a trowel. In this case, that many personalities from the past or have been left for people is a fact that, as stated by E. Zemmour, their anti-Semitism was more "important" than the far right, is another, less established - Rebatet, author of best-selling book under the Occupation, 65000 copies Rubble , n ' had nothing to do with the left. Simon Epstein, which was inspired by Zemmour, is more nuanced. Leaves with the respect to totally ignore the Jewish collaborators: for Epstein, I read with interest, the question does not arise, the Jews were by definition on the right side. We know or should know that, unfortunately or not, things were not so simple. I hope I will come back. A simplistic, simplistic and a half ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment