Fit Flange On Lead Pipe

The truth comes from the mouth of Cioran.

"The End of the World will appear when the idea of God has disappeared. From oblivion to oblivion, the man succeeds in abolishing its past and to abolish itself itself."

"No friend never tells us the truth. That is why only the silent dialogue with our enemies is fruitful." - Not exactly the idea, but it suggests that getting angry with his friends is a way to learn a little more truth self.

"" Unforgiven by vanity "- the word on Custine French is an undeniable accuracy. It is in any case to explain the Great Revolution and small equally."

"I read a significant number of papers on the state of affairs before the Revolution all these books convinced me that it was necessary and inevitable, I read about as well on the Revolution and I hated - reluctantly. "

"I never wanted a thing without wishing at the same time or immediately after the opposite."

"There is no isolated problem; whatever one we approached, it implicitly raises everybody else. "

" All these Western nations - the wealthiest dead. "

" should be dispensed with judging moral on anyone. Nobody is responsible for what is not and can not change its nature. This is obvious and everybody knows it. Why then praise or slander? Because life is evaluate it make judgments, and that abstention , when it is not cowardice effect, requires an effort exhausting. "

" All is not lost as long as there is dissatisfied with himself. "

" Any analysis that ends with a hopeful note sacrificed to the convention and destroyed itself. "

Best wishes!

Memory Card Reader Driver Rb 539

Dialectic Can break bricks, dialectics can it make us virgin again ...

Here extensive excerpts from an interview given by Raymond Abellio in 1969 to review Planet More , about Rene Guenon .

By transcribing (I do not report that I made a few cuts here and there) I have no specific goal: I'm no connoisseur of Guenon's work or, even less, that of Abellio, so loath to use without precautions work against one another's ideas, well I'd show if I started bragging to distribute vouchers and bad points, so I do not drink today for comment. Say that this conversation can at least see how these two authors are both close and distant from each other. You judge.


"Forced to wear on certain judgments Guénon restrictive, I would first like to emphasize that it is in him a huge positive, which most critics also agree. When Guénon appeared to beginning of this century, the esoteric doctrines were a real jumble of confused and ill-defined concepts. He did a considerable work of purification, he defined the concepts and fixed vocabulary, and especially he has studied the convergence of different traditions and identified the basic concepts.

- It does not seem that Guénon was your "spiritual master". Which ones you have to take this critical and reserved in giving you, perhaps, a broader vision?

books are certainly not the best way to receive spiritual influence. But, in this regard, Maite Eckhart, for example, touched me infinitely more than Guénon. I never knew Guenon, I have not approached. To read it, I do not feel at home "men inside "I feel rather Meister Eckhart. Dailleurs Guenon seems to have made an especially critical "outside" of the Tradition. I do not know if he lived in a domestic and on this point I can not wear a subjective assessment. All the apparatus of scholarship which surrounds Guénon is impressive, but this is ultimately a work on Tradition and not a work of re-creation within. At least that's how I feel. I admit that the negative judgments, pronouncements polemics Guénon bother me. But even his positive contribution I do not eat as much as I want.

- How Have you discovered the works of Guénon, finds Is there anyway Rene Guenon somewhere behind your books?

I known this work indirectly, thirty years ago, through what I call my spiritual master, that is to say Stone Combas. He had digested everything there is to digest, and, somehow, I gave it all chewed. And only after that direct instruction m'eut transformed, I found myself in contact with the work of Guénon itself. Is it because I was so prepared that I have not experienced "shock"? Possible. I would still be unfair if I did not remember that I keep the memory of such works as The symbolism of the cross or multiple states of being . I came out of Marxism and I remember being struck by the caveat that Guénon was between the magnitude and exaltation. I have found the Marxist opposition to the quantity and quality, but, you know, with less force dialectic. I also remember that the geometric aspect of the presentation of the Symbolism of the Cross had seemed especially demonstrative.

I did not find this same print on replay recent text. That's where I am led to say that this is the first external criticism. The formula is of course too simple, too severe, it does not address the role of consciousness-raising that Guénon was in its time, but the symbolism remains, by his own admission, pure space. The time is absent. It is virtually insufficiently dialectical. I know that is Guenon, and for good reason, anti-evolutionary. But there is still, to conscience, a genesis of being, or, if you prefer, a genesis of consciousness. When I was asked to study by myself, much later, the symbolism of the Cross The major problem seemed to be contrary to the temporal aspect even if, at the exit, temporality must be exceeded. But the only exit. We must revive inside this rise will lead out of time. That's why I put arrows between the branches of the Cross. My essay on absolute structure is, as Symbolism of the Cross, a meditation on the cross and six directions. But I found this symbol in my own way, I am not given initially. I reconstituted by an inner experience. That is why this work is entitled test. If at the exit I can verify the consistency between my findings and the texts of tradition, great. But it gives me more than a case illustration. Guenon He does not write the tests. It exposes the Tradition, he wants and sees any data. He did not re-create from within. He emerges as a result of a buried treasure that sheds its cocoon of earth, but that appears all set up and intact. It is obvious that the esoteric able to complete this work of clearing and cleaning work must itself be lit from within to be able to recognize the quality of what it takes to light, but it is precisely the nature of this inner light and I wonder that communication and that Guenon did not help me.

- In other words, you are more confident approach to the methods of Western philosophy?

Yes and no. Should agree on what is called Western philosophy. But it is certain that as Westerners we believed to be major time of Galileo and Descartes, and that since that time, we did not want to recognize true that we have received for such our own intuition of the evidence. At this reconstruction work inside the West has spent. Hence the concept of table open in Descartes. And this need of radical phenomenology of Husserl from the things themselves. I do not think this attempt is futile. This does not mean, of course, all products of Western philosophy teaching men are or become "real." That is another problem.

- But Husserl is you think a man of "true"?

Whoever said: "Phenomenology is a Gnostic community," even if it does not refer to tradition, was certainly open to problems of the inner man.

- Can you clarify your thinking when you say that you monkeys adds most critical "outside" of traditional texts?

See the meaning of the Triad, which deals extensively Guenon. With three "elements", the triad establishes a report two terms and a relation between them. It therefore announces a dialectical process, but it does not operate completely. The dialectical process is completely operated by the proportion, or ratio of ratios (as Plato called mediation). So in fact the number Six that in this respect is fundamental. If you do not establish this fact by analyzing phenomenological, you condemn yourself to overestimate the triad and to underestimate the senary, and for example does not include the large number Six in Kabbalah ... [ AMG: I cut here, those interested in this topic n have only to refer to the paper version or (re) read Abellio ...] See for yourself what Guenon said in the Symbolism of the Cross on the trigrams and hexagrams of Fo-Hi used in the Chinese book of Y-King . Why the 64 hexagrams do they cover the entire event? You do understand that completely releasing a dialectic of proportion as usual exegesis of texts of the tradition left in the shade. By retreating into the ternary Father-Son-Holy Spirit, where the Mother and the Woman are curiously absent, Christian tradition has also deprived of the power of dialectic senary. That is the problem of Women and the feminization of the Son who has been evaded. Julius Evola's book, Metaphysics sex , which is of considerable importance but is in line Guenon, is thus led to deal with the absolute Female where I prefer to call ultimate woman, genetic concept which implies an experience.

- Guenon's position against the modern West through the dark ages and as it denounces, for example, in the Reign of Quantity then you must appear unilaterally, too negative.

Yes, because the Black Age also contains positive factors. To paraphrase Heraclitus, one could say that nothing gets by strife and necessity. The genesis of the transcendental consciousness involves a confrontation with the resistance, opacity of the world. It can be assumed that the West is the current place of greater opacity, but also by the law of polarity, for our age, that of consciousness the most qualified. The guenonian plaguing the West refer to a traditionalist ideal East, entirely theoretical and timeless, while the real Orient, not protected by its tradition, is engaged in a process entropisation that has nothing to envy that of the West. The current East actually saw it his tradition? Not less, not more, in his high places, that the West in his or her true contemplative orders Gnostics. It is clear that the teaching of tradition as conceived Guénon is of paramount importance. It is still necessary that this tradition does not solidify into an orthodoxy and literalism. Also, rebuild and revive the tradition of the interior through a cataclysmic historical experience is at least as important. In this regard, the construction of the final Western philosophy is an admirable work, and its convergence with the tradition, even if the West is not yet aware, is a major feature of the next assumption.

- What today is initiation? What is its content?

I think today is the initiation of the order of the immanence of transcendence that much. The initiation can it come from a transmission, an unbroken lineage of initiates, she is the exclusive product in the West, institutions recognized as having received the regular filing of such primordial tradition of Masonry or the Catholic Church? I do not underestimate the importance of rituals and institutions, but it is underestimated, I think he's invisible power that does not recognize the possibility of another mode of consecration. In other words, I cross a tradition re-virginisée effort by "autonomous" of the Western mind, while taking care to put the word "independent" in quotes because any part of the universal interdependence. But it is perhaps peculiar to the Western mind to assert itself first as to take better self awareness then, the crisis in the West deluge, the very conditions of his addiction and his sudden ordination.

[ AMG: ach, comment, anyway! is perhaps the most important sentence of this interview, just being in the "next". One could say that we are in this "later" in this awareness, even during the debacle driven by the Western mind . Will we have time, and we have the possibility of "re-virginiser" the real, or is it too late (and Has it always been too late?), only one Apocalypse can reproduce of virginity? - The Paris are open! ]

- Guénon saw in our time that the cons-initiation. How do you mean?

I hear so dialectic in the sense that the reaction accompanies the action. It is certain that in its material and intellectual effects visible, the current world descends into the largest multiplicity. Very well spoken black Age Tradition. But the opposite is in effect invisible to the tops of some minds. It is significant that the cons-initiation today to take primary Motor extraordinarily entropic force of Marxism Asian appellant and reaction initiation of equivalent power. And then I think the mission of the West. Ultimately, I do not see initiation as a given but as easily been the product of a drama, a passion. This drama, I do not feel, at Guenon, the presence, even latent. But here we should give voice to those who knew him intimately. The whole debate is finally on the design that is the role of genetic history, even if one considers that initiation is at the final stage, which takes you beyond the story and makes you independent "events". Oriental traditionalists have been around long history, the West has yet to live. The former are somehow custodians of tradition, the latter are obliged to win. "

Pokemon Card Symbols Mean

stitching.




A bit of everything today. The world itself is increasingly disjointed, so why not me or my writing, from time to time .

I cited this sentence J.-P. Voyer, who had scored first blessed reading where the teacher said in substance that the very fact that a guy like it can not but be aware of the existence of a type as BHL proved that the world was going badly. Twenty-five years later, that someone like me could occasionally - not often, but not exceptional either - find themselves in agreement with someone like I. Rioufol , which represents almost everything I hate, perhaps, and though the very fact that the accession of that motherfucker in a public forum is not a good sign, perhaps, paradoxically, a sign positive, even very small: a bastard who preaches and division and separation, is found to state a few truths, although they must are becoming more visible ...

blogger qualitative di, di qualita , wrote to me after the first charge Alain Soral cons Marc-Edouard Nabe that many forum soraliens Net Nabe were attacking now, without asking questions about the validity of statements made by their Che. A few days ago, an academic who had sent a text I had written about him, lamenting that I should have "dragged through the mud," and even "killed", he says people do Based more on the Internet to form an opinion. There is pack, I am willing, on the net as much elsewhere, but it should qualify. In his biography of Daniel Halevy, Sebastien Laurent shows that when Halevy began to move away from his political left, it was soon difficult to write in the newspapers where he used to speak: soon he could no longer publish (ouch!) only through the inner circles of the French Action. Sébastien Laurent pointed out, drawing on similar remarks of F. Brayard in How the idea came to Mr. Rassinier (Fayard, 1996), that the same phenomenon occurred with the first denial, once removed from its original environment, the extreme left, which he remained all his life anti-colonialist, had no other choice, trying to make its revisionist arguments, but to have it published by the far right, with everything it involves views symbolic and concrete.

Presumably what one wants these demonstrations, and these examples, the fact remains that, at least for people who do not live by their pen, the Internet allows these sectarian logic. - Conversely moreover, those who, despite these new possibilities of non-allegiance to anyone but what they believe to be true, join anyway Sites ideologically tainted, may wonder what motivates them, as well as what the long term they may be at risk, these remarks from someone who does not like amalgam or those who make them. Having finished


The man who stopped writing , which I will describe very briefly generous book, both in the sense that we speak of a buxom woman, and because the author been generous, to his reader as in the case of most of his characters, I have a little depth the issue of conspiracy theories. Apart from the attack by Alain Soral already mentioned, here are the main evidence, to my knowledge, in terms of book Nabe:

- the response of the Free Thinker the portrait is made of him and objections submitted to him by MoE;

- study precise and convincing James Lawrence, mainly focused on the palimpsest of the Divine Comedy by Nabe, but which evokes these issues;

- the text that inspired the Free Thinker ;

- and finally the Lawrence James response.

This issue of conspiracy theories is important in that it intersects a purely political issue : who is the author of 11? where does the financial crisis?, etc.. The answer to each question of this kind is obviously rich with implications about the direction we are trying to give his fight, and a psychological question: average person, that I believe the world today? The Politics affects us all in some way, but it is dramatic in the sense that can and should be a theatrical and for those who are consciously engaged in a political struggle is the psychological aspect central for everyone - and everyone knows it - in our world ill-pleased. The two angles are also linked, since of course you can not wear the same look on the possibilities of confidence in what we hear if you come to the conclusion that 11 September is an American operation, or action of Al-Qaeda . In another sense, it is clear that in some cases - is one of about The man who stopped writing - that original suspicion that we would like to assimilate critical thinking but who will actually further, which is the source of the challenged official versions. This does not, conversely, some may hang on to these official versions for fear of having to ask too many questions if they gave up.

After noting in passing that the argument I used early 2009, also found in the book Nabe, that it is still surprising, if September 11 was a conspiracy, that 'None of those who attended, and that's not necessarily bad people, has felt the need, even if only to taste Warholian fifteen minutes of fame, to launch a stir on the Net - Free Thinker uses the statements of official figures Italian or Russian, or military members, but have not participated in the conspiracy - after noting that this argument not only remains valid but becomes a little more real every day that God does - while risking course to become brutally wrong ... - here are some modest diagnoses:

- I say this without citing specific examples, I made the mistake of listening to his reaction to the book without Nabe note on the moment the passages that seemed most characteristic, I will be more accurate if you ask me being: some formulations of the Free Thinker seem an intellectual cadaveric rigidity that gives full due to him as for others, how Nabe spoke silhouette in his latest book;

- especially in the center of this issue, there is the idea that "chance is the providence of Dunces": that famous sentence Bloy, known Nabe, the Free Thinker Lawrence James, and, probably, Soral, is open to varying interpretations, soft or hard . The interpretation hard is psychologically difficult to maintain - how not to sink into paranoia? - And dangerous operation of a Christian perspective: for God can be there is no chance - and yet it is far from obvious - but it is still the foundation of Christianity be wary of the desire to be like gods ;

- you answer me, probably with Guénon in support, that initiation is not made for dogs. I admit here, without irony, as soon I reach my threshold for incompetence, never having taken any initiation process. It does not seem so far unsuccessfully to cite once again So wrote Peter Boutang in 1946 in his Sartre is it possessed? :

"Nowhere better than in the works of Dostoyevsky, the opposition of contemplation and action has been updated. Contemplatives Dostoevsky live a loneliness that is moving into the other: the possessed assemble the contrary, they even form secret societies and transport in cities within their desert. The underground is a sign of possession, some form of secrecy is the inverse of demonic sacramental mystery. That threatened the cities are forced to organize their clandestine resistance, this is an effect of misfortune and defeat, and men can adapt ... but they expect that the revelation of their secret relationship to the country or the city, now that would be less serious if it was diabolical. " (La Table Ronde, 1950, pp. 59-60)

Boutang, who devoted his thesis to the Ontology secret, indicating that this topic had nothing for him in high school, was not I know esoteric. I do not pretend otherwise close the debate with this quote. But I think I have sufficiently clarified some ideas from my side to warn freethinkers on how thin the dividing line, especially when that, under the influence "of misfortune and defeat," we find ourselves forced to call the "underground resistance" against the Empire, the thinness of the dividing line between research and / or awareness of the existence of ancient divine mysteries, pagan or Christian (or other ..., well aware that the status of the mystery is not always the same), and possession paranoid and "demonic" .





What might be called semi-interpretation hard Bloy's sentence is not safe either. I am far from having jurisdiction to do so, but perhaps it would be useful to ask whether secret societies have tended, with modernity, to switch the "dark side" of this watershed. If modernity is born under the seal of distrust, it would certainly not incongruous that the older orders are gradually becoming the meetings, if not possessed, the less paranoid, convinced that they alone have reason. To remain among Catholics could thus study in this light that leads the evolution of the Knights Templar to Opus Dei through the Jesuits. Purposely selected examples among groups that actually took power, who know so that it can be - and who enjoy having.

is a track, I'll book. And I understand why in the making calls recurring in the twentieth century, the creation of secret elites - there are people like that at home or Abellio Caillois, for example - I've always been a little embarrassed. I'm not trying to put all the members of secret societies in the category of the possessed, just to get rid of them once and for all, I note that the remedy may not be far wrong, if not not feed him. And I think most, even if not exclusive elitist solution, the proposal of James Lawrence, to embody "our minds by the begetting of children beautiful, sensitive and intelligent - like mine! Virtue for example, the advertising ... which can also be found in the work of those who openly expose relationships occult, when we actually learn something, we agree.





- "The beast is not one piece (it has seven heads and ten horns), and St. John describes the same terrible fighting between its various incarnations: it is the Beast from the sea and the beast came from the earth devour Babylon in chapter XVII of the Apocalypse. The devil is the one that divides, for he himself is infinitely fragmented, " Lawrence James wrote, noting correctly that it is an important point of division between him and the Free Thinker. We find of course the ideas of this kind among the great novelists Catholics. It is used extensively in a book that I've talked a bit about two years ago, The hand of the devil Denis de Rougemont. I reject an eye on occasion. Note that if this particular book is based on the idea that Baudelaire "the best trick of the Devil is to persuade you that it does not exist", the idea is equally balanced, and by the same token, valid : a nice trick of the Devil returns to convince us of its eternal omnipotence has always and forever;

- this incision made, and since we have just mentioned Catholic novelists, why not see that there is confusion, at Alain Soral now between the "fools" mentioned by the formula of Leon Bloy and, dare I say, magnified by Bernanos, and "useful idiots" of the Stalinist orthodoxy ? J.-P. Voyer rightly evokes a "crisis of stalinite" in some recent outbursts of Alain Soral cons Nabe or Mélenchon JL. About Some Free Thinker, refusing to James Lawrence - or myself - can still doubt on Sept. 11, under the pretext that mistaking an important subject is an objective complicity with the Empire, are along the same lines. Let's be clear: I do not say anything about what happened on September 11, I do not think prior to the absence of any conspiracy, I believe fully that our time is filled (and even, well as I suggested above, one should ask, I agree with James Lawrence through this, if there were no more conspiracies now there are people who believe ... A useful idiot, idiot useful and a half!), I do not deny that the passivity of the mass can make it objective ally, to use another twist typical of Stalinist rhetoric, the Empire : It must simply be wary of the mindset that, under the guise of logic, firmness, courage - to hell is paved with good intentions - wants to send the idiots to the Gulag or PAL, as if being stupid is enough not a metaphysical point of view ...





- "A useful idiot, useful idiot and a half, I'm writing: one can, after witnessing the fights between MEN and Free Thinker on this topic, refer them back to back and criticize them in the resurgence of the old Sartrean argument, "Do not despair Billancourt. Knowing that there is despair, which is demotivating, September 11 by assigning the Arabs or Yanks, is an entirely secondary, which will only provide arguments easily reversible. This, incidentally, also weakens, a political point of view, position, criticized from a psychological point of view, the destroyers of the "objective allies". Whatever the truth about September 11th, this does not alter the basic trends: Americans are bastards, with tremendous power, but they are losing. To what extent will they lose and how long, I'm not a soothsayer. It is certain that they would risk losing more and more quickly if it were to be proved to the world they are responsible for Sept. 11. But whatever wants to believe the Free Thinker, we're not there - and it does not, fortunately, and as he rightly points out, the Iraqi resistance to weaken the invader;

- to be noticed pass it all the more regrettable that Alain Soral lets himself be dominated by Manichean impulses and Stalin, he is also benevolent and sometimes a little too much about the weaknesses and errors of men of the past. The hand of the devil probably ...

- I take this opportunity to squeeze it, it's been months since I seek an opportunity, I was struck by the fact that the Soral same reasoning vis-à-vis immigrants is similar to the one I used when opening or almost my coffee on the "Israeli-Palestinian conflict" we did not create the desired or situation, but all try to resolve it as peacefully as possible, between people of good will ...

- ... and I find on the subject. It may be that the Free Thinker and Soral are right on September 11 and that this will ever be proven. Nothing authorizes, however, and nothing will allow retrospect should this be shown to excommunicate those who disagree with them. If it turns they understood better than Nabe what happened that day, it would be to their credit. However, views psychological and metaphysical - assuming we can separate them - their position seems less rich, less human than Nabe, Lawrence James - or, it makes sense to me to include, bibi.

should extend from the side of sex these reflections, I have things to add to what James Lawrence writes, perhaps it would be interesting to link the issue of prostitution in all this ... I'll stop there and, as with Brel, "I still talk about me" by telling you to finish this dream two nights ago. Obviously, you have my word ...

I was in a bus, I am accosted by a charming young lady of 25 years or so, divine smile, chest fullness of a fluid. We talk, I feel a relative attraction to her, but without much flame. We continue our journey in a cab now, she looks at me, always with that smile sublime, and told me she thinks I left. I do not answer, she says, for her, she is ... I find it at the same time, "extreme right" and illico replied "Me too!" : It is this conceptual agreement, this nascent harmony, which makes me really want to kiss let me do it with pleasure as obvious enjoyable for my ego

... No comment!


PS: I discovered at the time of writing this video was put online without source Equality and Reconciliation. Anything that can help feed the truth is good to take, yawohl, but do not fall into simplistic exactly opposite to the doxa : it says here that Eric Zemmour, based on books by Simon Epstein is true, but is abstract - it's all Zemmour: get people interested in facts unexpected, but the Schematically sometimes limit the truth-cons - a trowel. In this case, that many personalities from the past or have been left for people is a fact that, as stated by E. Zemmour, their anti-Semitism was more "important" than the far right, is another, less established - Rebatet, author of best-selling book under the Occupation, 65000 copies Rubble , n ' had nothing to do with the left. Simon Epstein, which was inspired by Zemmour, is more nuanced. Leaves with the respect to totally ignore the Jewish collaborators: for Epstein, I read with interest, the question does not arise, the Jews were by definition on the right side. We know or should know that, unfortunately or not, things were not so simple. I hope I will come back. A simplistic, simplistic and a half ...

Green Stool And Mini Pill

"It is in the order of the world at this moment ..." My

"God is the author of all, God is the author of that well, we can not get out of there."


"Love the one hand everything indiscriminately. On the other hand the well alone. Mystery."




"That suffering is an evil, there is no strength to admit it."


"The trouble is not enough, there must be a misery without consolation.

Woe to them [the rich] : they take their consolation. (Luke VI, 24.)

should not be a consolation. Representable no consolation. (The ineffable consolation then descends.)

Return debts. Accept the past without asking, for the past, compensation in the future. It is also an acceptance of death. Stop the time to the present moment. "


" To rob the imaginary kingdom of the world to reduce to the point that occupies space and time. Solitude. Then we have the truth of the world.

If there had not been finished and thinking? Only God and the world?
God is crucified by the fact that finite beings think. Beings subject to necessity.

If there were only God and matter ... ?

crucified God is the fact that finite beings, subject to necessity, space and time, think.

Knowing that as a thinking and over, I am crucified God.

like God, but God crucified.
A Mighty God provided it is bound by necessity. "


" If we look at a given moment - the moment, cut off from past and future - We are innocent. We can not be at that moment that what we are, all progress involves a period. It is in the order of the world at that moment, whether we like.
Isolate and implies an instant forgiveness. But this isolation is detachment. All problems are reduced to time. "


" You shall be as gods. (Genesis III, 5.) Sin is the desire to be as gods otherwise than by participation in the divinity of God. We are born with this sin. It is the Luciferian sin. Need

Ombudsman for worship God is an imitation and that imitation is pure.

He [Jesus ] emptied himself of his divinity. We need to empty the false god with which we were born.

prevent them from eating the tree of life. Prevent us from being false gods. Death warns us that we are not gods. That is why it is so painful to us, as we do not fully understand. (And even Christ ...)

Killing is bad (and intoxicating) because we feel removed from death that we inflict. "


" The institution of slavery cache to men (masters and slaves ) this truth, that man as such is a slave.
The best institutions are those who lie the least.
Money is a lie; sign too general. "


" See God in every event, without exception, but as the proper relationship of event-specific appearance. Learn how each appearance is not God.

Faith, the gift of reading.

The gift of reading is supernatural, and without this gift there is no justice. Understanding of this supreme reality what this lack of object that is the subject of love, and playing this reality in the objects taken together and each individual object. Condition of obedience, that is justice.
faith relates to reading, and love to gravity.

One can not help loving. But we can choose what you love.
You must love what is absolutely worthy of love, not what is worthy in some respects unworthy to others. (Platon.)
Nothing that exists is absolutely worthy of love. Therefore
love what does not exist.
But this object of love that does not exist is not without reality, not fiction. For our drama can not be more worthy of love as ourselves, who are not.

Faith. Believe that nothing that we can grasp is God. Faith negative. But also believe that we can not grasp is more real than we can grasp. That we can not enter the criterion of reality, but instead is misleading. Believe that finally appears, however elusive, hidden. "


Incarnation. God is weak because it is impartial. Action not active. Sends the sunshine and rain on the good and the bad. This indifference of the Father and the weakness of Christ correspond. Absence of God. The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed ... God does not change. Christ was killed by angry because he was God. "


" On the Poverty Human to God. But not as compensation or consolation. Such correlation. "


" Link needed the supernatural and suffering. The man made of flesh, how could he not suffer when he united with the divine creature? God suffers him to be finished. Suffering involved in the creation. Suffering without consolation, because the consoles are manufactured by imagination, that must have emptied to make room for God. Imagination is the false god.
Some acts (eg killing, except perhaps in exceptional cases) are essentially imaginary, although they are actually performing. They are the ones that are banned. Leaving
place in the mind to God, we leave the flesh to necessity. Obedience, supreme virtue of the creature. "





" The same words (eg, a man told a woman I love you) may be commonplace and extraordinary, depending on how they are pronounced. And this way depends on the depth of the region to be where they shall, without the will can be anything. And a wonderful agreement, they will touch the listener in the same region. Thus the listener can discern, it has discernment, and only this condition, these words are worth. This report is also that of art and taste. And one of the two forms of faith, that by which one acts, one by which one believes. "


" The suffering and enjoyment as sources of knowledge. The snake gave knowledge to Adam and Eve. The Sirens have offered knowledge to Ulysses. These stories teach that the soul is lost in seeking knowledge in the fun. Why? The pleasure may be innocent if they do not seek knowledge. But it is permissible to look in pain. "

SW, 1941-42.

Buffalo Drive Remove Cd Partition

"lampoon" in your ass ... My




In the series" How disqualify you an author in three lines ", here is an example of beauty:

" The thesis P.-A. Taguieff converges very well with that of a disciple and friend of Mr Gauci, the sociologist Paul Yonnet, which denounces in his pamphlet against SOS Racism, Journey to the Center of the French malaise , the very serious responsibility of the sixty-eighters in hatred of the nation, focusing on the slogan: "We are all German Jews! Even if the judge P.-A. Taguieff about P. Yonnet too controversial, the orientation is similar as that of Shmuel Trigano, which provides an argument against the anti-globalization movement, accused of collusion with radical Islam: "We are now witnessing a return to the surface of ideological positions that were common in the 1970s, in the nebula and leftist Third World. As in P. Yonnet or S. Trigano, criticism continues the legacy of May 1968 by Taguieff hollow shape his conception of the nation and republicanism. It is inseparable from the first issues raised in his first field of specialization: Anti-Semitism and far right. "

These lines are taken from a book by Serge Audier, Thought anti-68. essay on the origins of intellectual restoration , La Découverte, 2008 (p. 336). This is the only mention of the work of P. Yonnet, a brief mention in a chapter P.-A. Taguieff. It seems difficult, if one is rather close, an ideological point of view, the general line Editions La Découverte and if we do not know Yonnet, not to infer from these lines it is "even more right "that P.-A. Taguieff also empathize with the Zionist shock Trigano, and fiercely anti-68 as well as Marcel Gauchet, which is the" disciple "(?) and" friend. "

Yonnet That name, I read with interest, is coupled with that of Taguieff revisionist or denier Trigano does not irritate me more than that, I discovered from reading the same book S. Audier there may be some interesting things in the texts of the least controversial former. What is troublesome is that amalgam, which is not even sure whether voluntary, which will range ipso facto an author in one category, finally nothing less than "those-that-do- must-not-read. "

I'm not exaggerating: according to an old technique Stalinist found too often in the books or the Discovery of Manufactures, misuse qualifiers as "very right-handed", "Catholic ultratraditionnaliste" comes regularly in the book of S. Audier blacken the authors studied and affect the overall analysis, which is what it's worth, but that would have won very clearly not to "restore" (a reference to the subtitle depreciation) a permanent yellow line to do not cross between good and evil. Reflected in these revealing lines:

"A first obvious tension lies in the contrast between the normative choices posted by P.-A. Taguieff - the Republic and its motto," Liberty, Equality, Fraternity "- Conceptual frameworks and mobilized to defend democratic modernity. This difficulty, we saw it was already that Mr Gauci, whose paradigms are largely from the anthropology Dumont, marked by accents traditionalists whose sources go back to Guenon and his critique of modernity . '(p. 341)

There are two levels: if, as Taguieff P.-A., the authors used anti-democrats like Guenon, Nietzsche or Sorel, while proclaiming himself a Republican, the reader should be clarification on the possibility that there, not "want to reconcile postmortem former enemies, "as written in a form revealing S. Audi (p. 342), but to reconcile ideas which are or are not reconcilable. The requirement of theoretical consistency of S. Audier is perfectly legitimate, but do see is the other level, the issue is more general? As a reader of Gauchet and Guénon as a "disciple," let's go over big words, Dumont, I'm obviously affected by these lines, designed to prevent the study of what S. Audier, in a passage where he still evokes Guénon and Gauci, called the "exceptionality problem of modern Western societies "(p. 326), is made from a different perspective than that of the exceptionality. Schématisons: if Castoriadis, often cited in this book, J. Rancière and A. Brossat explain why democracy is different from other schemes, it's interesting because they are for democracy. If it's Guenon or Dumont does, watch out ...

I do not know if P.-A. Taguieff sheds light on this subject, but it is not very complicated yet to reach a position that is moreover, that many writers - reread The antimodern Antoine Compagnon: one can be very doubtful, more or less reasoned, more or less subjective, the real benefits of democratic regimes, while recognizing that these schemes are best suited to today's humanity and that, at least for now does not draw anything much better in the distance. I do not even say that this is my point of view, assuming that I may have a definite on this issue, I say simply that such a position has nothing inconsistent and regretted that a book 370 pages is not able to give him citizenship.

Moreover, to finish at least today, on this Thought anti-68, one can only emerge from such a book and wondering why it is trustworthy. Beyond the natural limits of such books, S. Audier being much more interesting when talking about Aaron, he knows that when it ventures into lands unknown to him, to the point, Errare humanum is true, but how revealing, write Rule Game for The Great Game (p. 326), beyond this natural limit, we can only be achieved by seeing how the theories of Jean-Claude Michea or poorly Francois Ricard presented - I'm talking about authors I read in the text - an overall impression doubtful if I'm S. Audier at fault on this case I know first hand, why give him credit on such other cases for which his analysis seems credible, but where I do not have the tools to judge its validity? And at the same time, criticism of Marcel Gauchet for example, are often relevant.

short, back to the texts ...

... and in this regard, The anti-68 thought I at least have an idea - the grist for Paul Yonnet here. Page 180, quoting Tocqueville Serge Audier:

"Individualism is a mature and calm feeling which disposes each citizen to isolate themselves from the mass of his fellows and to draw apart with his family and friends so that, having created a small company for its use, he willingly leaves society at large it own. "(From the Democratic America, Vol. II, Part II, ch. 2:" individualism in democratic countries. ")

Issues a chapter to the city famous and nausea by French liberals of the 80s, including his late twilight ("Not only does democracy make every man forget his ancestors, but it hides his descendants and separates his contemporaries, she continually returns to itself and threatened to confine him entirely within the solitude of his own heart. "), chapter to replay dizzy as previews to rub shoulders with admirable reckless generalizations, these lines, just cons other parts of this chapter, propose a flexible definition of individualism, which includes the permanent support of the individual, during its existence, the "small company" of "his Family and Friends. "filiation becomes individualistic," I wrote recently placing me in the context of Paul Yonnet, Tocqueville in these lines confirms brilliantly, before you forget this idea, or at least hide it in the final sentence of his chapter: no, the modern individual is not alone (it is however separated), he very hard to be alone, the modern individual lives with and is funded by a "small company".

What also Facebook, in its most common use (excluding use in professional, political or promotional work, etc..) Unambiguously clear, since there continues ad nauseam the existence of this company 'friends', which predates - and is then reinforced in its consistency - To update it via the Internet. Spend time on it, not fight against loneliness in the sense that we would be alone and abandoned if it was not on Facebook, since we found it again and still have friends that are has, however, is fighting against the possibility of being a bit lonely from time to time with "his own heart," Tocqueville would say - as if it was so scary.

Why Does My Deodorant Burn

réacosphère in your ass.




- This is the title of a tune where I dispel some ambiguities that I have to be partly responsible, as I sometimes find myself quoted by blogs that I find difficult not to caricature the right, where no one moves away from Sarkozy to fall into the wrong Maurras. I started taking some notes about it, have for the time failed to turn it so that it is interesting to someone other than me, and again, let's get

So the theme of the day, a particular case of the above. I thought about it by reading two days apart a statement by Renaud Camus and a lament of Jean Raspail in Kling-Kling, where we explained that the replacement of the French population by immigrants-come-from-anywhere-and-who-are-full of Hell is underway or already completed - and long-planned big-bad-by Boumediene.

The subject can not be evacuated with a shrug. I remember being struck by the developments in this respect a Yonnet Paul, who in his Journey to the Center of the French malaise in 1993, does not seem to take seriously enough doomsday predictions of this kind Alfred Sauvy, before they are considered more carefully in The decline in death (unless I am mistaken) in 2006. It is further perfectly legitimate to distinguish between what one may think of immigration and what we can think of immigrants - not to mention that it is undeniable that we , that is to say the wonderful Democrats who govern us, not much has sought advice from the French on that, and that the it does seem to do that if business or other Woerth.

Given this, what is striking in both texts of MM. Camus and Raspail, is how these defenders of France finally see it as an old woman a little impotent in the process of being raped, without reaction. Let's remove it the tail of the Arab unleashed, and everything will be fine ... Besides this table "victimizes" France is in tune with the times, which is no shortage of salt coming from so-called anti minds "politically correct" so-called "manly" etc.. it does not match reality.

Without going into the game of "who it has begun" (we have colonized, say some, because we have settled the Turk, replied the other ...), a little historical perspective is important. I you point out some essential changes in French society, particularly the links between Paris and the provinces, have nothing to do with immigration. I fully agree with Debord when he considers that the essential process of disintegration of the French company would have happened the same way if we had stayed warm between "us". This "we", we - that is to say, especially but not only , generation 68 and generation ago - have more or less consciously sought to destroy - indeed, to destroy it, we have needed immigrant labor, though useful for building the infrastructure needed for growth if desired by all. We pay the piper for policy then, particularly through the emblematic issue of cities, is in some way that justice.

More generally, as some like to talk about civilization in recent times, say thirty Glorious (my ass!) Were the place of choice for confirmation of a civilization that was the choice of modernity and that this choice was in fact involved the submission of the nation to something other than itself. It is the ambiguity of Gaullism, I'll always hearing now: making believe that this development could be done within the national framework, or rather, because it was not impossible a logical point of view, having been led to believe that this development took place in a national context, even then, immigration of labor (and then stand in the next decade) on one side, given keys to the bosses ( which by definition is cosmopolitan, which is his right but must be constantly reminded) of the other, even though it was done in a manner and at a pace that led to the weakening of the national framework.





Well, I will answer it, but MM. Camus and Raspail does not necessarily argue washing France of its own responsibilities: besides, your analysis implies that the current immigration (in both senses from the presence of immigrants, the arrival of new immigrants) frankly does not help things.

course, but:

- to see how often this kind of position is referred to by sites much more eager to speak ill of Muslims and leftists to trace the actual French responsibility in the matter before us, such a reminder does not seem useless

- "We made the United States. (...) What claim, considering the presence of proliferative immigrants of all colors, all to find us shot in France, as if we stole something that is still with us? "It's not just admit that Debord was right to write that in 1985, but understand that this is still true and to this extent that the model of France raped me seems wrong. We continue to make U.S. (= motherfucker), and immigrants for years have understood: the rantings of Regis Debray a Max Gallo, a Henri Guaino can do but the French are more seduced by the United States than in France. It is logical, and partly our responsibility, that immigrants become Americans them too. Especially - in this sense that we are only partly responsible for this situation - they may already be more or less Americanized before arrive.

Before specifying the causes and global consequences of this last point, let's look at its particular consequences, that is to say limited to our beautiful country: if one sticks to Muslim immigrants, which both focus attention, we must never forget, when evaluating the benefits and harms of their coming, they are at least as much Americanized Islamization, and that their arrival in France Americanizes far more than it does " Islamizing " and / or "musulmanise. You have to be stupid and / or manipulative as Ivan Rioufol to focus only through some spectacular cases, the religious dimension and the dimension forget buggers. And if the answer that is even more serious for France, it will perhaps be right, but it will fall on the previous proof: Muslims do here but follow the same path as the eldest daughter of ex- Church, seeking to reconcile faith and comfort capitalist.

- Finally, and again we follow Debord, while the accompanying Cioran, it is clear that these changes go far beyond French "After all, this continent has perhaps not played his last card. If he began to demoralize the rest of the world, to spread its stench? - This would be for him a way to still retain its prestige and to exert its influence. " Cioran has not here said the last word on everything, the question of globalization requires that exchanges between cultures, as Levi-Strauss Sahlins should allow us to be approached with caution, but he understood it, and we leave it at that for now, that the West in its most sinister might do well to survive himself, alas ...

"France is surely regrettable. But regrets are vain., "Wrote Debord. I noted in a corner of my head a few months ago a formula very close to the meaning: France is a country of crap, which unfortunately no longer exists. My formulation is even more excessive than Debord, for besides that it is not so sure that France has disappeared, it was with all his faults, not so bad as that. In short, to conclude, I joined a Debord again when it considers that the central issue is "deeply qualitative," so far false evidence of population statistics,

whose use by A. Camus, I would forget pointed out, is also questionable: Read P. Yonnet was contrary to the impression, and that brings water to my mill, that immigrants line up quickly, and even more quickly, on the French model (and even model made in France , France's legacy to the world), and are quickly becoming less and less children. Again France is not inactive and submissive ...

, false quantitative evidence that put such a Peter Boutang furious when he heard Giscard d'Estaing to make a cross on the destiny of France under the mere pretext that it was less populated than the U.S. the USSR or China. "He lived people on the surface of the earth, and here, when France will be gone. The ethnic mix that will dominate is unpredictable, as their cultures, their languages themselves." This is what emerges from this mixture, the buggers squared or otherwise compromise about right between traditional values and what remains in the West - humanism - that counts. The rest ...






(For the record: I reread before posting, I find this text very similar in spirit The man who stopped writing . You decide.)

Gpsphone Pokemon Smaragd Rom

"Dispossession is at home in France." Some people say




All is not also relevant in this text 1985, either in substance or form, but Guy-Ernest at least has the advantage for him to take the issue through the proper end, logically and chronologically. So if you do not mind, I encourage you to read what he wrote here in 25 years:

"Everything is wrong in the" immigrant question ", just as in any open question in the present society and for the same reasons: the economy - that is to say the illusion pseudo-economic - has been made, and the show was treated.

We discussed only nonsense. Should we keep or remove immigrants? (Of course, the true immigrant is not the permanent resident of foreign origin, but one that is perceived and perceives itself as different and intended to stay. Many immigrants or their children had French nationality, many Poles or Spaniards are finally lost in the mass of a French population was different. As the waste from the nuclear industry or oil into the ocean - and there are slower and less defined "scientifically "The threshold of intolerance - migrants, products from the same management of modern capitalism, will remain for centuries, millennia, always. They remain because it was much easier to eliminate the Jews of Germany in Hitler's time that the North Africans, and others, by far: in France because there is neither a party nor the Nazi myth a native breed!

Must assimilate or "respect for cultural diversity"? Inept false choice. We can no longer assimilate anyone: neither youth nor the French workers, or even the provincial and old minorities Ethnic (Corsicans, Bretons, etc.). because Paris, a city destroyed , has lost its historical role was to the French. What a centralism without capital? The concentration camp has not created any German deportees among Europeans. The distribution of the show focused not be made uniform as spectators.

It revels in simple language advertising, the rich expression of "cultural diversity". Which crops? There are more. Neither Christian nor Muslim, neither socialist nor scientistic. Do not talk about absent. There is more to watch a moment of truth and evidence, that the dramatic deterioration-World (U.S.) of any culture.

This is definitely not voting for that one assimilates. Historical demonstration that the vote is nothing, even for the French, who are voters and are nothing (1 party = 1 other party, a campaign promise = its opposite;
and more recently a program - which everybody knows that it will not be required - moreover finally ceased to be disappointing, since he never contemplated any significant problems. Who voted into the disappearance of bread?).

We recently confessed that figure reveals (And probably manipulated down): 25% of the "citizens" of the age group 18-25 years are not registered on electoral lists, simply by disgust. Abstainers are others that are added.

Some put forward the criterion of "speaking French." Laughable. The French are they talking about the present? Is the French spoken by the illiterate today, or Fabius ("Hello trouble!") Or Françoise Castro ("It lives you or t'effleure it?"), Or BH Levy? Will not it not clear, even if there were no immigrants, to the loss of any language and any articulated reasoning? What songs play this youth? What

sects infinitely more ridiculous than Islam and Catholicism have easily won an allowance on a proportion of educated idiots contemporaries (Moon, etc..)? Not to mention the severely retarded or autistic that such cults do not recruit because there is no economic interest in exploiting these cattle: therefore it is left in charge to the government.

We made America. It is normal that we find here all the miserable problems of the U.S., the drug mafia, fast-food proliferation of ethnic groups. For example, Italy and Spain, Americanized surface and even at a considerable depth, are not ethnically mixed.



In this sense, they remain more widely in Europe (as is AIgérie North Africa). We have here the troubles of America without having the strength. It is not clear that the American melting pot still works long (eg with Chicanos who have another language). But he is quite sure he can not work here any time. Because that's what the U.S. manufacturing center mode current life, the heart of the show that extends its pulsations to Moscow or Beijing, and which in any case can not allow any independence to its local subcontractors (the understanding of this unfortunately shows a subjection much less superficial than that would destroy or moderate the usual critics "imperialism").


Here, we do nothing: the colonized who failed revolt, the yes-man of spectacular alienation. What claim, considering the presence of proliferative immigrants of all colors, find ourselves suddenly in France, as if we steal something that is still with us? And what then? What we believe, or rather what do we still pretend? It is a pride for their rare holidays, when the pure slaves indignant that metics threaten their independence!

The risk of apartheid? It is real. It is more a risk, it is inevitable there already (with its logic of ghettos, racial clashes, and a day of bloodshed). A society that is completely broken obviously less able to accommodate without too many problems a large amount of immigrants that could be a cohesive society and relatively happy. We have already noted in 1973 that striking the balance between technological developments and changing attitudes: "The environment is ever more hastily rebuilt to the repressive control and profit at the same time becomes more fragile and encourages more vandalism. Capitalism in its spectacular stage while rebuilding and producing fake incendiary. And its decoration is everywhere as flammable College de France. "

With the presence of immigrants (who has already served some unionists may denounce as" war religions "some workers' strikes they could not control), we can be assured that the existing authorities will promote development of small-scale experiments that we have seen clashes staged through" terrorists " real or fake, or supporters of rival football teams (not just English supporters).

But it's clear why all political leaders (including leaders of the National Front) have sought to downplay the seriousness of the "immigrant problem". All they want to keep all their allowed to watch one problem in the face and in its proper context. Some pretend that it's only a matter of "goodwill anti-racist" to enforce, and others that he comes to recognize the rights of a moderate "just xenophobia."


And all work together to consider this issue as if it was the hottest, almost alone among all the frightening problems that a company does not overcome. The new apartheid ghetto spectacular (not the local version, folk, South Africa), it is already there, in France today: the vast majority the population is trapped and brutalized, and all must have been the same had it not been a single immigrant. Who decided to build and Minguettes Sarcelles, destroy Paris or Lyon? We certainly can not say no immigrant has participated in this infamous work. But they have only obeyed strictly the orders given to them: this is the usual misfortune of wage labor.

How many foreigners it actually in France? (And not just the legal status, color, facies.) It is obvious that there are so many that we should rather ask: how is he French and where are they? (And what characterizes a French now?) How would it soon, French? We know that fertility decline. Is not that normal? The French can no longer bear their children. They send them to school at three years, and at least sixteen, to teach literacy. And before they have three years, more and more people who are "unbearable" and hit more or less violently. Children are still loved in Spain, Italy, Algeria, among Gypsies.

Not often in France now. Neither housing nor the city are no longer made for children (hence the cynical publicity of government planners on "open city on children"). On the other hand, contraception is widespread, abortion is free. Almost all children today in France, have been desired. But not free! The voter-consumer does not know what he wants. He "chose" something he dislikes. Her mental structure that has more coherence to remember that he wanted something, when he found himself disappointed by the experience of this very thing.

In the show, a company class wanted, very systematically, eliminating history. And now it claims to regret this one particular result of the presence of so many immigrants, because France will "disappear" as well? Comic. She disappears for many other causes and, more or less rapidly on almost any terrain.

Immigrants have the best right to live in France. They are representatives of the dispossession and deprivation is at home in France, as she has a majority. and almost universal. Immigrants have lost their culture and country, very known, but could not find others. And the French are in the same case, and just as secretly.

With equalization of the entire planet in the misery of a new environment and intelligence of all purely false, the French. who accepted it without much rebellion (except 1968) are ill advised to say they feel more at home because of immigrants! They have every reason not to feel at home, it's very true. This is because there is nobody else in this horrible new world of alienation, that of immigrants. It

people live on the surface of the earth, and here, when the France will be gone. The ethnic mix that will dominate is unpredictable, as their cultures, their languages themselves. Arguably, the central issue, deeply qualitative, will be this: will these future peoples they dominated, by a practice emancipated, the present technique, which is generally that of the sham and dispossession? Or, conversely, will they be dominated by it in an even more hierarchical and slavery today? We must assume the worst, and fight for the best. France is certainly regrettable. But regrets are vain. "

Discharges Before Period

has made outta mud Man Is ... ("The world as a device is part of the world as phenomenon.")




us continue our propaganda pro-Borella, as the clarifications given in The crisis of religious symbolism seem to be beneficial to all. If, in the words of P. Boutang nearly forty years ago, "the first work of reconstruction will be metaphysical, work, work, even if we repeat some :

" These are the considerations that allow us to grasp the true meaning of infinitization the cosmos in the early seventeenth century, and we justify could talk about it, an indefinite limitation. It is precisely this concept of a universal or indefinite restriction that allows us to realize, ironically, and the apparent expansion of cosmic space and the feeling that seizes prison when minds and hearts . We repeat - because that is where our eyes much of the cultural change experienced by the European soul - or the boundless openness of cosmic space is consequential, fundamentally, the reduction of world the geometric extent, that is to say its closing ontological. Conversely, the closure Space medieval and ancient world is a boundless correlative ontological, because the order of things is mysteriously connected to the divine order it symbolizes. This intrinsic boundless world agrees to depth of human life. For the life of man always takes place in a world that is both finite and deep, never in unlimited space and surfacial. Life is finitary, it requires a frame, a circle, a "medium" (Umwelt ) [ rooting, say Simone Weil ], an ecological niche, a matrix, a paradise. But at the same time it added to this space three-dimensional closed (that the cross symbolizes the rivers in the Garden of Eden), a fourth dimension, the only one infinite or near-infinite depth internal, geometrically non-figurative, presence of the hidden world behind in all things be extending their Secret to Being infinite. Therefore Galilean science may well provide the intoxication of a limitless expanse where plunge our eyes, the collective subconscious no mistake. He feels this opening as a loss, this expansion as a decoy. "( The crisis of religious symbolism , p. 89)

- that advertising has for once managed to translate the slogan Film the former (?) - advertising Ridley Scott: "In the Galilean space, nobody can hear you scream" - a quick Google search





to verify that I am right about this slogan tells me that in the space called the "conquest", which Jean Borella spends the rest of this passage is true, we hear nothing .





- What gives me a perfect transition to any other text from the same book. On one hand I have almost no scientific culture, on the other hand, as I explained last May, I have some general reservations on the use of science by philosophy or religion. It certainly does not preclude any reference to contemporary science, here is always so in the writings of J. Borella:

"Analyses of the finest recent physics ... lead to a paradoxical reversal of the ordinary conceptions: it is not the separation or distance between two points is first and obvious, and thus the possible correlation of these two points must be explained, but rather it is the "inseparability" becomes "principle" and distance or gap that is the problem: "the distance is not intrinsically between this or that element of reality independent. It is we who say, somehow, between such and such elements of empirical reality or, in other words, the image of reality that we build for our trade and use " Bernard of Espagnat, In search of the real , Gauthier Villars, 1979 46. This book may raise criticism, especially because the character a little summary (to us) of some philosophical considerations (and must This suggests a physicist of our own views on scientific matters!). But this does not suffice to discredit his basic thesis: the objective reality is not material in nature. "(P. 86N).

striking phrase, so I had the title of my first use of Crisis ... , and which I found today a programmatic look: my cautious temperament, Musil my side if I want to be pretentious, my cowardice if I want to flog, trying to restrain myself, my enthusiasm makes them a frame overflow ("school" in the sporting press, a frame overflow School is still, do not ask me why) and is quick to declare that the only interesting philosophies today, the only ones that can help us overcome the crisis, including financial and elsewhere throughout this shit (shit comes after the food, the fish rots from the head: the crisis is a consequence rather than cause, although it has its own rhythm), are those details and explains the principle. - And that is how, party walking on eggshells, I get excited activist, is typical ...

But back to Espagnat. The old voyers never extinguished in me can only wriggle on reading the name, and go check what that wrote fuck thirty years ago , the master

"We learn through the physicist Espagnat ( In search of the real ) that Bohr defines science primarily as a work of communication between human beings and not in terms of a given reality and its inherent mission would be to try to describe. In other words, science is for Niels Bohr synthesis part human experience. (...) In the design of Bohr's notion of reality properties objects seems to be strictly subordinated to that of human experience and have meaning only through it. So somehow a new cogito : communication alone is certain, everything else is questionable. The conclusion of this delightful school in Copenhagen is that physics can no longer speak of a kind in-itself kind of material self-respect and an object object in itself. For Bohr, the nature and matter are only parts of the world defined as the total activity of men. On Espagnat adds: "More knowledge expands, becomes more of those big field which one can say they are aware of ourselves before being aware of a problem outside world or eternal truth. "(...) The importance

conferred by Bohr instruments to measure Therefore he said that it is impossible to speak of a phenomenon as it fails to fully describe the experimental setup used to study this phenomenon at the limit: the world as experimental device to observe the world as a phenomenon "In truth it must be said that the device is an integral part the phenomenon and thus the world as a device is part of the world as a phenomenon. Thus, the propagation of a particle in space is not in itself a phenomenon. The assembly formed by the transmitter device, the particle environment in the here and a receiving device according to Bohr phenomenon whose physical science can legitimately speak. But the instruments used by men, although men must build them before using them. And why stop there way and define the phenomenon at the laboratory door and does not extend to different locations where instruments are manufactured. Thus this state prepared by the physicist is included in a report prepared by the world itself, this phenomenon is itself a state of the global division of labor and the world is the only suitable device for observing the world, ie the fact alone is qualified to observe reality. "

All this seems perfectly back in our analytical framework of the day. I reproduce even some theories:

" The fact that we pretend that what is meant by words of nature and matter or regions of knowledge does not mean we pretend that nothing exists which is not idea, thought. The movement of the idea takes place in what is and is not it. But what is and is not thinking is not necessarily what is meant by "material" and "Nature." This does not mean that what is and is not thought to be beyond the reach of knowledge as claimed by Kant. Instead, knowledge as a world, practical communication, movement of thought in which it is not destruction of what exists and is not thought, or at least destruction of its independence: mediation self-mediation of what exists. Knowledge as a world, far from foreign to being, is its self-destruction, its internal division infinite. Being is not left untouched out of knowledge, but knowledge is the internal collapse of the infinite being ... Hegel describes highly poetic of this collapse. The style of Hegel, style tornado and storm, is the apocalyptic style par excellence.

other words, what we call "nature" and "matter" are not in what it thought would move. It already the movement of thought is already a part of a state of destruction of what exists is already a region of the founding of the universe.

On this point, we differ from Hegel and are modestly dualistic. The idea of movement is the movement of the idea in what exists and thus becomes the world. We accept that something exists prior to the movement of the idea and not the idea, but we deny that something is "natural" or "matter" at least what is usually referred to by these words. Anyway, this hypothesis dualism is totally free and superfluous in the state of things. It does not eat bread and we do not deprive us of the pleasure of doing it. Which of course for our original sin divine essence. We will never be born as deities ! In the words of Lautreamont, we are also the eternal birth. Religious myths have a rational basis, rational basis which can also claim the laborious fables materialistic, because these myths are the work of a world and known as such. (...)

In a more general, we find ourselves in agreement with Espagnat (...) To challenge the object is the fact that the object exists as an object in object-self, that "nature" exists in nature as nature itself-regardless of the knowledge one can take From this knowledge somehow add-on is inessential and powerless as a reflection to that nature in-itself nature. Similarly, we disagree that there is material in self-respect regardless of the knowledge that we take. The latter expression is also incorrect since it implies that anyway takes knowledge of a subject or even what exists independently of the thought. But it is not. Matter as a region of knowledge is not what knowledge is knowledge but the knowledge itself or at least results. Then knowledge does not acknowledge the "being" that exists independently of thought, but this being destroyed, destroyed its independence. It does not deal with being, it is the destruction of the independence of being. "(Journal of contemporary prehistory, 1982, pp. 140-146)

I do not remember this idea of destruction, expressed here with important nuances in its formulations, has been taken by the author in recent years. Invoking Lautreamont (as in other texts from the same period, Breton), unless I am mistaken, remained the order of the exceptional. Anyway, in 2005, JP Voyer, in a text of a densely , talks about this idea of "dualism modest"

"This allows me to clarify what I heard when I said I was to Dr. Weltfaust, contrary to Hegel and Marx (...), modestly dualistic. I did not say that I feel dualistic mind-matter , But what is the meaning object which is not subject . What is not an object? The appearance, ie the appearance as qu'apparition. This applies, of course, for items that never appear, like the numbers - no one has seen a number and nobody will ever see and yet, judging by Frege, numbers are objects -. I am therefore dualistic because I recognize two orders: the order of objects visible (things) and invisible (invisible, of course, but ... formulable. Forms, otherwise there would be no math), and order appearance. If that does not produce bizarre sentences, it would be unwise to make generalizations visible and invisible in obvious and not obvious . "

- Is dualism still, I do not know, and the distinction kinds of be borrowed from Wittgenstein and Vincent Descombes and discussed later in this passage, could she not, at least in some way be connected to the gradation of depth in the symbolic order that found in the theories of Jean Borella?

Well, that's enough for today ...





... or rather not, because I came across the transcript the wonderful article "Heterosexism," from the Dictionary of Homophobia , led by Tin unfortunate that we found there is little .

I referred in my article lengthy review of this hilarious dictionary in 2006, so it is only fair to inform you of the contents, it is now available online. I will not devote an entire text, life is short, to read it I'll just note how one can be struck not only by the light of historical considerations of the author, by his way of solving the problem by starting its definitions, the confusion, well analyzed by Muray in the time between 'stigma' and 'discrimination' (discrimination mentioned Muray, it was originally, and this can only be, that setting differences, this does not necessarily lead to abuse, in this case, we do not see how the idea of a complementarity between men and women who fit together well as I know, would necessarily result in the submission of the second to first), but also, that in my memory was less attracted my attention, for a reconciliation unfortunately very common between the bourgeois culture of the nineteenth century, indeed as hard to homosexuals as very hypocritical, and the history of the "Christian West" and - to phobia phobia and a half - a dull and unpleasant misogyny my faith quite common among gays.





And this time, good day!




The technique, well ... But the spirit!

Welcome Notes For Invitations

hundred times on the job ...




"Any man who has a conviction whatsoever, there is a God, nay, he believes in God. For any belief postulates the absolute or supplement." (Cioran, 1959)


"Obedience is a vital need of the human soul. It is of two kinds of obedience to rules and obedience to human beings regarded as masterpieces. It implies consent, not not in respect of each order received, but a consent once and for all, subject only, where applicable, the requirements of conscience. It is necessary that it is generally recognized and foremost by the Heads, that the consent and not the fear of punishment or the lure of the reward is in fact the mainspring of obedience, so that the bid is never suspicious of servility. It must be also known that those who command obey their side, and it requires that the full hierarchy is goal oriented and whose value is the same size felt by all, from highest to lowest.

Obedience is a necessary food for the soul, a person who is permanently deprived is sick. Thus, any community is governed by a chief accountant who is sovereign in person lies in the hands of a patient.





Therefore, where a man is set for life at the head of social organization, it must be a symbol, not a leader, as is the case for the king of England must also limit its freedom conveniences more closely than that of any man of the people. In this way, effective leaders, but leaders have somebody above them;

idea that there are, let us recall , Maurras: religion is, or should serve, the strong protect the weak, limiting the power of the strong.

other hand they can without that continuity is broken, replace itself, and therefore each receive its indispensable part of obedience.

Those who submit masses of people through coercion and cruelty to deprive both of two vital food, freedom and obedience, for it is in the power of the masses to give their consent to the authority within that 'they undergo. Those who favor a situation where greed is the main mobile remove obedience to men, since consent is the principle which is not something that can be sold.

Thousand signs show that men of our time had long been starved of obedience. But we took the opportunity to give them to slavery. "(S. Weil, 1943)

Where we touch again the finger at the limits of the Fifth Republic, which, although it was run by a Catholic , not wanting to play on "greed" and the purchase of consent. (I recall that Rooting , whose text is derived, was originally written to feed the ideas of bodies such as CNR, whose program will influence the constitutions of the Fourth and Fifth Republics.) In a time of remembrance Gaulle, it must be remembered that the worm the fruit is long overdue.

(Indeed, to follow SW, capitalism and democracy are simply antithetical. We find again the ambiguities of Gaullism triumphant: there was consent, and that's why it has almost worked. But it was also a consent agreement to growth, "modernization" in comfort ... to slavery - which de Gaulle was at times painfully aware.)

This consent theory also points out that most " lay "of Levi-Strauss . Secular purpose, but without resorting the sentence is very interesting but general Cioran put emphasize it, we should see whether the exchange of reciprocity according to Levi-Strauss founded the state can be developed without a keystone, a kind of absence without greater reciprocity: "It must be also known that those who command obey their side." - At a time they obey God, and it can not be the same reciprocity. Remember Bernanos: "Between us there is that exchange only God gives himself." Not that God is not in an exchange relationship with the holder of power, a kind of system of reciprocal guarantees of legitimacy is that God, himself, may simply give, without reciprocity (and not only, of course, the holder of power): it is this possibility that has s' from the system of reciprocity that allows him to "hold."

(In a hierarchical society, at the other end of the scale can be found without giving the recipient: the renouncing Indian is the prototype, and its essential role in the perpetuation of Indian society. C is that it does not, it does not participate in the system of reciprocity is society, which involves the maintenance of that system.)

Returning to the comparison between Simone Weil and Levi-Strauss, and hypothesize that if the Indians seem to be able in some cases (it should be careful) to dispense with a keystone above is that the separation between sacred and profane, which I alluded hereby , Durkheim support (still not very Jewish Jew .. . it was the heyday of French Judaism) is not the same at home, even this distinction is irrelevant: the savage lives in the sacred, the ceremony ... in a more egalitarian system, which need not be locked at the top and bottom at once because there is not really high and low, and because the sacred is first present in each member of society.

Lawrence James, in a recent conference , detailed the various personifications of power and functions - warrior, religious ... - In traditional societies (broadly defined). This is a story nonlinear and can not be summarized in two words: I issue simply assumed that prioritization of society and secular areas of distinction and sacred are intertwined. This distinction can take very different forms in different places and eras. But it is obvious that a society like ours, which officially does not sacred, which is officially egalitarian (with different modalities such as egalitarianism between French and Anglo-Saxon egalitarianism, cf. Dumont) eventually deprive tools to understand what the consent - the last straw for "democracy"! - And obedience, the syntheses of the Protestant type and / or Kantian (the moral law within me ...) can not, despite their merits, fill all the holes made by modernity.





"conclude." Plato (and Cioran's words with which I began is a kind of "we are all Platonists) to Guenon's thought of the hierarchy is also known that it is strong and consistent. Via Daumal someone like Rene, who read Guénon and has read at Dumont and probably (but I am proof ...) as Simone Weil, this thinking continues to spread in the twentieth century . It is also possible that de Gaulle had personally met Guénon ... in the living room of Daniel Halevy, quai de l'Horloge in the very center of Paris, since Both met him (S. Lawrence, Daniel Halevy , Grasset, 2001, pp. 316-317), about the same period. It would be interesting to have confirmation ... In short, the idea is to revisit, as the brilliantly Simone Weil, the idea of consent, which can evoke democracy, supported the idea of hierarchy (and vice versa ...). This, as I pointed with my memories and modest means, reaching for inclusion in what could be a theory of power who seem, wrongly or rightly, remain the poor relations of the thoughts of the hierarchy and tradition, Indians. Because they are worth it ...

How Long After Being Exposed To A Cat

Christians were the heirs of Habraham by Faith. Who are the heirs of the Christian church? The Divine Word

Dear beloved like many of us know the first people elected of God the creator was the Hebrew people which God creator gave them the ten commandments for the salvation of their souls . But before them there was the patriarch Abraham and his family who received by faith the salvation in the days of King of Salem Melchizedeck . At the dawn of the first century AD, came Jesus Christ born of the unique virgin Mary. It was through him the redumption human. Thus was created the heirs of Abraham by Faith. For spiritual inheritance is acquired by faith and not by works, although the works do not lose any of their important value. The disciples of Jesus Christ, through the intermediary his name and the law of love has healed the different nations snake biting Satan . the apostles in their prophecies, especially in The Apocalypse of St. John spoke of the imminent arrival of their master . To accomplish this coming prophet is born in France in 1555 the name of Michel Nostradamus has written 10 books prophecies called Centuries. These books dear beloved talk about comings and event from 1555 to 3797 AD, including cults, the Kingdom of God the Creator , the end of Chistian and creation in the same lineage of the religions of Mars Jupiter and Saturn.

So who gets the inheritance the Christian church ? Is is it possible to give legacy of a people to another people without death of the latter? Is it possible to grant itself inheritance of a people without waiting for his death?
First in the letter to Henry King of France to H085 H074 Second, Michel Nostradamus said

"Since the creation of the world until Jesus Christ he had 4173 years 8 months. Now Jesus Christ in it (from it) by the diversity sects I leaves ,......"

We see that since Jesus Christ he had a diversity of sects.
Then in the same letter to Henry King of France to H012 H011 Second, Michel Nostradamus said

"... beginning with this time March 14, 1557 and ignoring far up your arrival will be after the beginning of the seventh millennium (2000 after Jesus Christ ).......... or opponents of Jesus Christ and his Church will begin to proliferate stronger. "

We see Michel Nostradamus said that from March 14, 1557 to 2000 after Jesus Christ there were only opponents of Jesus Christ and Christianity, ie of Paganism. Also as it is clear that Christ is Risen in July 1999 AD and that from beginning of 2001 Church of Jesus Christ is dead ie n ' is no longer valid, so how can we situate the acquisition of inheritance this church before 2001 AD. In addition spiritual inheritance is acquired only not by works but by faith. Now it is Christ who is the source of that same Faith who is here today with us from the pulpit. Do not let people rob us of our heritage . So for

answer this question, we, men and women, elderly people and fetuses, believers and nonbelievers of all regions of the earth who live to begin today until the year 2001 the year 2042 who are the heirs of the Church of Jesus Christ. Our fathers were apostles, as the patriarch Abraham was for the apostles , see the letter of Paul to the Romans. The year 2042 because that is the date that would end this new religion of God the Creator created by Mars the risen Christ, the first rider of the first horse white of the Apocalypse of Saint John and begin the new religion of God the Creator created by Jupiter, another resurrection of Christ Jesus, the second rider Faithful and true the second white horse of the Apocalypse of Saint John.

So dear beloved do we submit more to the laws of death by violating the sacred law of God the Creator, but we submit to the Holy Law of God the Creator following the Divine guidance of the Risen Christ in March. So we will not be the sentenced to death for our sins but heirs of a new life, eternal life . Let in joy, love, peace, gentleness, goodness, faith, kindness, patience and self control of God the Creator . God the Creator be blessed forever Amen !
To submit to the Holy Law of God the Creator by following the Divine guidance of Mars, we realize site:
http://www.henry-nostradamus.e-monsite.com/