Organizer bullfights Arles is primarily a local man, and he was reappointed director of the arenas of Arles last year.
In Jalabert was the Camargue that sticks to feet like mud on the boots of his grandfather, Alphonse, who was Guardian of the Marquis de Baroncelli (founder of the Nation Gardiane) in 20s. The Mas is in Chassagne, in the heart of the delta, rooted as this family of horse breeders and bulls.
Luke Jalabert was a "rejoneador", a bullfighter on horseback, and he organized with his brother Marc, bullfights and horseback riding for twenty years when they take over the management of the Arena of Arles in 1999. A delegation of public service which has been renewed this summer for the third time. SAS Jalabert was opposite yet another prominent rider, the rejoneador Nîmoise Sara Marie. But its success has reinforced the confidence the municipality. "In 10 years, we have 15 times the full arenas, the more tickets for sale" explained Luc Jalabert. And it is true that the company is running full. With a turnover of 3.4 million euros, a strong attendance (120 000 spectators per year, with the Camargue races), the arenas of Arles are a success. Jalabert have developed the "space Toro, on the outskirts of the city, with its corrales where aficionados will judge the qualities of animals fighting.
Jalabert Luke's philosophy is to offer bullfights in which "the breed of bull is as important as the name of the star bullfighter. " Arles is therefore defined more as a city "toriste" (facing the bull) than "toreriste" as Nimes (more concerned about the matador). According to him, is that "bullfighting Arles is more rooted, more rural, but also more popular than Nimes, where aficion is more urban and bourgeois." But Luke does not disdain Jalabert major matadors, since the star bullfighter bullfighting has dominated this summer is itself a Jalabert. Jean-Baptiste, said Juan Bautista, is the son of the director of the arena, and he triumphed in Madrid in June, leaving through the front door of Las Ventas (a privilege which he was the only one to benefit this year).
And Luke Jalabert has the showmanship. Bullfights "Goya", where the sand of the arena is covered with a design inspired ephemeral renowned artists such as Christian Lacroix (another famous Arles), or last year, the New York artist Ena Swansea which was dancing on a sand blue bulls, September 11.
Nitin Sawhney is a London composer and producer of Indian origin, born in 1964. He lives in Rochester (Kent), England. album London Undersound , October 2008.
Set in England for twenty years, Nitin Sawhney, is over the album, became a figurehead of the London Underground.
Known as the surface for his symphonies and soundtracks, he made his eighth album, the centerpiece of his musical erudition and his mixes underground. Nourished by a report in the British capital emotional, affected by the attacks that resulted in opening the rapper Natty in Days Of Fire, these eighteen tracks and interludes based on electro-jazz rhythms and sense Acute traditional Indian music.
Sawhney offers to prestigious guests such as Paul McCartney on My Soul, an exceptional case. The dreams of sun Roxanne Tatei on Distant Dreams are soul, while Tina Grace on media denounces the inhumanity of the dark trip hop transmission between a folk and joyful Daybreak sung by the Pakistani Fahem Mazhar, and finish in beauty sound of the sitar Anoushka Shankar. Eclectic and valuable.
word deaf CMB spectacular diffuse everywhere in the penumbra
the absence imperturbable a stretch hail
gossamer
disaster observation remembrance marks the slow route to slash some ephemeral and lucid in that flash was transient insult body tearing torture atoms atrophied canvas alterations as evidence of flawed and sudden
Francois Leotard expressed on the attack in Karachi.
In the second cohabitation, in 1993 he was Minister of State, Minister of Defence in the government Edouard Balladur. It is at the heart of the case. He said the attack in Karachi in 2002 is directly related to the discontinuance of committees decided by Jacques Chirac and on sale at India's most modern submarines as those delivered in Pakistan. It opens up the trail of a revenge against a country too favorable to India.
But in his article published on Rue 89 , it simplifies the complex relationships among the three countries into a perverse threesome. The role of France, particularly the diplomacy of the reign of Jacques Chirac, who plays a shady game between India and Pakistan.
At this time, that of the attack, as the privileged (and interested) Balladur, President Zardari (also known as Mr. 10%), is giving way to General Musharraf, after the coup succeeded. The latter is then rapidly cleaning [1], and backstabbing clan Chirac (canceled contracts under Indian influence [2]) certainly did not put Pakistan in the best arrangement with France.
Chirac's decision to stop the commission negotiated by Balladur had already "blown" France to the Zardari clan in 1996 and sales of submarines to India have blown in Musharraf!
"The attack in Karachi on 8 May 2002, killed eleven employees of the Directorate Naval Construction (DCN) have been committed with the approval of the Pakistani secret service ISI to punish France's decision to sell submarines India, military and political enemy of Pakistan. This track - already late - now seems more plausible for the unpublished secrets collected by Liberation with two witnesses to the forefront of the times ".
" This track is also confirmed, under cover of anonymity, an officer who once rubbed shoulders with the present employees of the DCN in Pakistan, including through the provision of Deflog society. (...) The officer, with whom Liberation exchanged several letters, it also ensures that the attack was committed by a small group controlled by the ISI to punish France for its decision to sell submarines to India more efficient. "
According Leotard," there would be a strange reversal in the review responsibilities to consider MM . Balladur, Leotard and Sarkozy as the cause of this tragedy. "Nicolas Sarkozy was at the signing of the contract, budget minister in the government of Edouard Balladur.
It means so Chirac and his famous diplomacy as officials death of employees of the DCN in Karachi.
How not to prove him right?
However, this does not milled Sarkozy provided the suspicion of financial chicanery on the bottom of bribes, to create a war chest of the clan Balladur.
(1) According Dasquié ( Libe 04/2010) Musharraf neutralize heard in early 2000, the military and financial networks in cahoots with his political opponents - especially the couple Benazir Bhutto Ali Zardari (purging Severe ensued, and Admiral Mansur ul-Haq, who since his dismissal from the Ministry of Defence enjoyed a peaceful life in Austin, Texas, was arrested April 17, 2001 at the request of Islamabad and extradited . Returned to his country, he acknowledged having received $ 7.5 million under the contract and the contract Agosta SM-39 missiles, and has repaid).
(2) sales program for the Dassault Mirage 2000 (initiated by Chirac for 15 billion francs, three times more Agosti) which was also the subject of negotiations in 1996 and bribes (see the incredible detail Point of 08/96) and allegedly canceled after pressure from India. The Indian army is equipped with the same Mirage 2000 has had a tactical advantage in the Pakistani-Indian war Kargil in 1999 , allowing a decisive victory. A replay
A 15-day intervals, Egypt reproduces the scenario of the crisis Tunisia.
Yesterday, Arnaud Montebourg tweeted: "A power that removes Internet uses violence against its people will condemn himself. Support the Egyptians "
Yes, support the people in revolt. There are only the expression of true democracy, that of a people that wants to take its destiny in hand.
This revolution, for it is one, is underway and its outcome is still uncertain at this time of writing. But the movement is organized, thoughtful.
Again, as in Tunisia, new Internet technologies involved in the revolt, to coordinate the channel. activists can also adjust the face of cyber-repression. They circulated fliers by mail, (like those above, to download "The Atlantic ") to avoid calling Twitter and Facebook because of the surveillance carried out there.
Egypt has therefore taken a radical step: unplug the country, "a first in scale. The resignation earlier the government does not seem to calm the ardor of the opponents. The bloody suppression (left dozens dead, hundreds injured) can overcome this rebellion without the support of Western democracies.
's time to see if they sacrifice their values enshrined on the altar of realpolitik (the position of our foreign minister is to be monitored closely).
Hosni Mubarak "must go", says the opponent and Nobel Peace Mohamed el Baradei, speaking on France 24 earlier. "I go down the street today (Saturday) with my colleagues to help bring about a change (...) and to say to President Mubarak that he must leave, "he added.
Mohamed el-Baradei said he hoped that new events "even broader" take place this Saturday. "The police no longer on the streets, the army has taken over," he adds. Traditionally, the army did not used to confront the Egyptians. I hope qu'Hosni Mubarak will get the message before things become very serious. "
Ach, it was the last that I missed, sadly a collection that eventually ...
few beauties for pleasure
"Advertising is the thing in the world more beautiful, more beautiful than a million dollars because it is what is beautiful about a million dollars. Advertising is a higher revelation that art and philosophy as it is revealed that the art and philosophy. Advertising is the victory over the chimeras, novelty eternal rule which groaned chaos, the subject of conciliation , exchange control, the constructed situation. It judges all things. It is heaps of certainty, the glory of the universe. Advertising is a majestic river and fertile. The theory is the storm, Hegelsturm. The theory should aim advertising.
"For some practitioners grotesque human sciences, the past is supposed to explain this. This is the hidden confession of their inability to understand the present. We do not go away with the university. The secret of modern society is not in archaic societies or animal societies, but the company's most modern is the secret revealed in archaic societies or animal. Similarly, the fact that the animal trade does not mean that man is bestial, but rather that the animal is human. Contrary to a widespread and very wrong, the fact that man knows the sexual exchange does not mean that man is bestial, but the animal is human in this report. Determinations that distinguish the animal rights are the determinations of the man himself. The man is the truth of the animal, the animal's true. The human race is the kind of all animals. So the man is more animal than the animal because the animal is real, and the publicity she is more universal than the universe as it is the truth of the universe, verified the universe, the universe based, the universe removed.
Ethnography can provide ideas to those who do not. How miserable that have renounced all hope of wealth, who have criticized their lives any aspect of our world are trivial and accommodated all, could they conceive of wealth. If modern society is unable to understand an ancient society, it is simply that it is itself too archaic and did not produce a sufficient degree of abstraction, lack of scarcity. Ethnography may be the touchstone of the science of advertising and can not cases provide the principle of this science.
(...) As long as we persist in the wild to see a child of the archaic nature careless and lazy, avoiding as far as possible to work towards a task and take pains, that awaits him in the mouth ripe fall fruits that it provides fertile tropical nature with generosity, we deceive ourselves, and we remain unable to grasp the reasons that inspire and goals he pursues when he embarks on an expedition Kula, or any other company. Quite the contrary, the truth is that the wild can archaic work, and on occasion actually work very hard and consistently, with perseverance and determination, and he does not expect to do to be compelled by urgent needs. Just read a few pages of Malinowski to grasp immediately the grandeur of the Papuans who are engaged explicitly to the practice of humanity in peril of their lives, and to understand that the sole motive of their work - apodicticity happiness - the pure pleasure of the abolition of work, the practice of trade and advertising. One can only be seized with respect to the science of these savages who know that the work becomes human when it is deleted, that human labor is the work removed and the Advertising is the only work worthy of man. In contrast to the profound misery of the modern rich, we admire the grandeur of the rich Papuan leader in advertising spends all its resources. "(1975, pp. 46-47 and 52-55) The rich modern
has also some intuition, if one relies on its side more and more "conspicuous" as we say nowadays, but he does not understand that ostentation is meaningless in a society by the unrestrained practice of fuck it has itself helped to render meaning. Well done to his mouth.
It's a question I ask myself, not an end of inadmissibility, I have already mention this somewhere, but I wonder if the fact that I am not attracted more by the work of Guénon, while I feel his importance and that most writers of the twentieth century that interest me have been more or less direct influence, is that it's hard to cram them Indians. Maurras nonsense written about them now outdated, but ultimately, Mauss and Malinowski help, we can incorporate them into his theories. With Guénon it seems more difficult - but if I tell myself something stupid here, no doubt someone will correct me ...
Anyway, we complement these brilliant variations on the main theme: "Humanity is a ceremony, "with the phrase of Peter in his commentary Boutang Banquet:" All desire is spiritual "(exact phrase is:" Desire, desire, is spiritual in its own way ", Hermann, 1972, p. 137), which seems to apply to the exchange - including the sexual exchange. - To be continued, with pleasure ...
what I aspired: power, while an outdoor pageantry. I have seen nothing that might be more personal values, needs more intense or more deep. determined early on by social values of power and expression, I chose the edge of childhood tyrannical both sides of the body and mind: the muscle and writing. within these tracks, I had access only to empty - there I was putting that desire - and in that vacuum, in the fullness of my requirement with the unbridled greed that led me, still more tense in an energy surfocalisée. for many years, I padded, I had to find themes.
in androgynous Eros
I loved the moans filled with finesse and charm of the enjoyment of A.., both kinds of cries resembled but were more numerous, more widely. They took the guts. ranges, a song with a specific meaning, melody, beauty. I said: "I still sing your little cries" that my ears can enjoy, my soul, my heart can beat in unison, that you understand the precious gift you make me. I chews you like to play a musical instrument, I'll tear you, one by one, pretty little hair, for the pleasure of hearing the sounds of your complaint. I bite small tits, small strawberries, much redder, more vivid between the enamel on my teeth, and you love it so. I scraped my nails your skin. I beat your ass. I punched your hole. I eat your tail bluntly. I am careful not to pierce a bite, your balls, but I get angry with their beauty. I grind your flesh. j'enserre and compress my muscles, feral, your body. I am inhabited by a carnivorous joy. I hate love.
night original primal sedition it is prowling technical abyss I did not see yesterday that crude brilliance & oblong repulsion under my skin with it extended almost ... dissipation lure illegal trance hilum infinitive he brings forward mechanisms fuzzy heightened by the real, awkward ... the moving image stranding pale ghost of plastic c Alley fatal they have the word structure and movements in free ... we no longer know this darkness
some dust and it differs finally this horizon sparkle and fragments of great and daring illusory ...
offense or the next century will be the refusal, or it will be an area prison.
sleep. Sleep, happy mortals. that sleep may be the last. mouth ajar. soft lips. a saliva coated with silt commissures. as a pale blood. like white blood. ra-ra-rattle of the undead. Life abort the heart slowed. hours of the night and dead. any part of the earth moving at the same time not to pile into the archipelago of effigies. rights expire approximately in his dream. Tomorrow is a mathematical abstraction high. tomorrow, which is only meaningful experiences. in north
how to explain what happens in the trunk for those sudden bursts of blast that regulate beat on your arteries pulsations secret of the world? perception of being for good central hyper-responsive to the emerging world. thinking leaves the seat with a bang of captivity. addresses, includes, elucidates the micro-hairs. mathematical equations toughest, if it were proposed, would be resolved as common additions of two numbers. tore the mystery around me. I was coming from my clay. scoured my wings, I would take off my triumph. although my man's appearance has not changed and no one was able to distinguish myself in the crowd. this crowd of people on the move had resolved in its lowest volume, the size of a walnut, say, to agglomerate-free story to my own cells, circulate in my blood system with the same force that a nutritional liquid vitamin injection. the crowd was me. containing any living form. thence to m'annexer god at the same time, there was only one step. so I was the receptacle of God. and then god himself. and then the mind of god. and then nothing more than mind. light plume of blue smoke that lazy, indecisive, over the rooftops of the city. was one with ether. what was left in me became spherical plastic. like the stars. invisible as the orbit of the wheel. like the snake and the carcass of destiny. twould now my voice through the breath of the animation. I would ensure the anointing of baptism. it is water or fire. and if I come back here one day, I present myself to the gates of the city on a donkey strong and peaceful. to start, but this time victoriously fight against the hydra marshes. in north
(...) it is tearing beauty. in the mechanics of women
fruits of bird hunters necks quivering leg in black stocking light silhouettes on the table a hand with fingers that look indulge annoying young foreign
laughter burst from the lips that buissonnent storm blue hair aside misunderstood all these words and accents that sound like life is life and my life auction
day will come
time without me
day will come
of time without me
poems in scalded
you are the smell of fur blue oil in the port
every wind their neck salt and sands 'armor
you're forgetting a hairstyle the silhouette of a decor
the game with a tender Torture where the cheater is the strongest
you are the invisible crack surveyor's death
in London
midnight strikes nowhere in the city.The wind grinds against the window of the darkened room she has a scarf on, casting the only heat lamp allumée.la is floating. sitting on the edge of the bed, she knows that I look remove her stockings. in the mechanics of women
keep the spirit alive. do not believe in formulas or honorary functions. live like it would burst. being of youth in action. making fun of the world and scream. situation in
Eric Zemmour is politically incorrect Patrick Poivre d'Arvor is politically incorrect Liliane Bettencourt is politically incorrect ingrid betencourt is politically incorrect Jean-Marc Rouillan is politically incorrect Nicolas Demorand is politically incorrect luis fernandez is politically incorrect Olivier Besancenot is politically incorrect dog m. Houellebecq is politically incorrect Micheline Dax is politically incorrect - when she whistles Charles Aznavour is politically incorrect manu chao is politically incorrect Sophie Davant is politically incorrect damien saez is politically incorrect Philippe Sollers is politically incorrect Angelina Jolie politically incorrect Zinedine Zidane is politically incorrect Christophe Alévêque is politically incorrect Jean-Louis Aubert is politically incorrect björk is politically incorrect - especially in airports francis helm is politically incorrect nicole kidman is politically incorrect Jean-Luc Delarue is politically incorrect Osama bin Laden is politically incorrect Francis Cabrel is politically incorrect Borloo is politically incorrect Julian Coupat is politically incorrect Julian cleric is politically incorrect Julien Lepers is politically incorrect Chevènement is politically incorrect - or his coma William Leymergie is politically incorrect the sodomite son of P. de Villiers is politically incorrect Michel Sardou is politically incorrect marine cartier is politically incorrect Patrice Alegre is politically incorrect Claude Allegre is politically incorrect laurent romejko is politically incorrect my cock is politically incorrect my knife is politically incorrect Andre Rieu is politically incorrect - as well as his violin yoko ono is politically incorrect Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali was politically incorrect mikael kael is politically incorrect Chantal Akerman is politically incorrect Régis Jauffret is politically incorrect the Drafting 'Head Téléstar is politically incorrect the doctor m. Jackson is politically incorrect STIs are politically incorrect Albert of Monaco is politically incorrect jl godard is politically incorrect - 24 times per second ...
about Nadine Morano, there are two syllables in his name too ...
laziness and cowardice are the reasons that explain that so many men, after nature has long been freed from a foreign management, however, remain happy throughout their lives, children, and it is so easy for others to pose as guardians of the first . it is so easy to be minor! (the hilarious emmanuel kant)
if the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, infinite (william blaaaaaaaaaaake)
"I do not like the drums ..." The word on defense.
"(...) I ran a bit ... Do not, consider me jealous! It would be wrong to recognize my perfect independence. The Jews, I fuck well they can make me nicely, right as left as the center, across, in particular. They do not bother me personally a little, almost none. It is quite a conflict "idéolochique.
Certainly, I notes that through the Yid: publishers, agents, publicists, etc. ..., under the influence of movies, scripts Jewish aggressors, wankers pourrisseurs, politics Jewish sum instructions Jewish occult or official, the little French artistic production, already so skinny, so little radiant, is now well and truly burst ... Jews must crush all heard it ... But life is not so long nor so happy as it may in fact prevent you from sleeping. And then, remain quite fair, the Jews were always well supported in their work of destruction, spiritual bondage by mannerisms "how noble Renaissance" and then then pusillanimous bourgeois officials finally châtrerie entire academic purist hopelessly obtuse that we die French arts known.
What bothers us most about the Jews, when you look at it is their arrogance, their revendicarisme their perpetual martyrologo-dervicherie, their dirty drums. In Africa, among the Negroes themselves, or their cousins in Cameroon, I lived for years alone in one of their villages in the forest, under the same straw hut at the same calabash. In Africa, they were good people. Here, they annoy me, they make me feel sick. They became quite unbearable in Cameroon, at the time of full moon they become agonizing with their drums ... But other nights, they will snooze left well alone, safely. I speak of "the country pahoin, most countries negro negroes. But here, now, France, moon or no moon, still drumming! ... Negroes for Negroes, I prefer the cannibals ... and then not here ... home ... Basically, the only damage they cause me, aesthetic damage, I do not like the tam-tam ... As for hardware, my God! I found it extremely easy to suit me ... I could afford not only to ignore all these abominations, but I found it childish to enjoy, and how, very handsomely, this wondrous murine invasion ... putrefying ... Thousand ways, a thousand precedents! I found it permissible among other things, considering my charms, my very attractive physically, my solid financial situation, to marry without the fuss, however small Jewish property in court ... well-connected ... (It is always lurking, just feel the ground), I thereby become naturalized, "a little Jew" ... Feat that is doing superbly in medicine, the arts, the nobility, politics ... Passport for all the triumphs, all immunities ... All these comments, I agree, keep babbling ... Bagatelles! ... Babillon ! ... We noted that the Jews seem to have chosen English as the language of universal standardization (they failed to opt for German) ...
Is not it fun to watch in this regard that young Jews of the best families (including French Jews), most often go to Oxford to complete their studies. "Finishing Touch! "Supreme polish! If I wished, when circumstances forced me, I could maybe write my books directly in English. It is a rope to defend myself, a small string to my bow. I should not complain ... But nobody made me bow my little gift ... I good enough that I do in life some gifts! Everything is here! ... For the moment I still prefer to write in French ... I find the English too soft, too gentle, too chochote. But if necessary ... And Anglo American Jews express myself regularly, another reason ... and read me! ... We are not very many, among the French authors of the "world class". That is the saddest. Five or six, I think ... at most, which can spread ... That little ... much too little! ... The invasion is one way, it bothers me.
Publishers Judeo-Anglo-Saxons, very aware of things manufacturing literary novels recognize the "standard", they are manufactured to exactly the same every year by thousands at home. They do not care "reply" bother other hairpieces ... Personally, I can be, without doubt, to defend myself for a while yet, thanks to my kind incantatory lyricism my shouting foul, anathemas, in this very special kind, rather by the Jewish side, I'm better than the Jews, I give them lessons. That saves me. I pass among the Jews of the United States for a strong mind. Let's hope it lasts! "( Bagatelles for a massacre , pp. 173-74 of the reprint certainly very timely published during the war, the text I was reminded of 1937)
I chose this passage a bit confusing for many reasons, I do not have to explain in detail, but especially because Celine, with the acute awareness that he has always had its own peculiarities, it clearly expresses a node of the current case: between him and "the Jews", finally, that that the holler stronger from Darwinian assumptions quite similar. Insofar Bagatelles ... is not only a huge delusion, but also a compilation, almost an anthology "Célinisée" of any anti-Semitic literature, it should perhaps not try to see the last word of Celine on "the Jews", but in such a way, we can recognize a trace of the old Christian complains about them - Bernanos used in Large cemeteries in ... equivalent boldly Hitlerism and the Jewish mentality - that "the Jews" have no pity for the Gentiles, and have no sense of forgiveness and Christian charity. Coming from a fierce anti-Christian as Celine, it's pretty fun, but at least he does not here appear: if the novelist Céline and the doctor Destouches are capable of pity, the pamphleteer intends to be on the same plane as it considers to be the opponent to Darwinian Darwinian and a half, "revendicariste" revendicariste and a half ... It
are many dimensions to this case: the incredible cowardice of Frederic Mitterrand, the game a little surprising to Nicolas Sarkozy, which we are told that Celine is his favorite writer, which always amazed me: is there more 'Sarko human than I thought? or did he read that Celine superficial? ; Anyway, we can not say that here is the forbidden, unless the contrary ... it does help to be amused him right in his denunciation of Jewish power - why not, after all? ; Communalism and all the trimmings, a certain aspect franchouillard at Celine - also very complex - which makes it unbearable to some, Jews or Gentiles, who do not hide their hate franchouillardise - a concept also to define, etc. .
But the dimension that interests me now is this sort of collusion between Céline well perceived by the self-proclaimed spokesman for the Jewish community, and himself, this perverse game (and dangerous) who yell the loudest, which allows some to occupy the space, sometimes for long. Peguy was diagnosed phenomena of this kind, I time felt able to identify the same trends in the couple Lanzmann-Faurisson, and somewhere, I think that's what irritates the shit kind of Klarsfeld at Celine: they can not afford it "celebrated" or "celebrated" by the Republic, because of the indignities he has actually written, they also feel that by doing so they condemn play his game, and they have a little memory of the texts, they know that Celine knew - and put their deep well in advance. Somewhere, it's fun, but we noticed that the Jewish tendency to "silent majority" gain nothing in the case, on the contrary.
PS: here you find Celine another text, written after the war and its relation to the "Jews." I take this opportunity for a mea culpa regarding my analysis of the volume of the Pleiade grouping the letters of the teacher, about his potential denial. First, I use a tone a bit condescending in hindsight I do not find it necessary to place Henri Godard and Jean-Paul Louis (which I also had not remembered that he was the director of the publishing of Lérot, I hit a few days), then I contacted Jean-Louis Paul, just to make him my observations, and n have never operated his answer. It reminded me of the publication in the Pleiades in another letter to Celine on denial, to show me that he did not want to hide the subject. For almost a year, I could take the time to answer, and now I arrive just after the battle that I myself started. Anyway, I stand by my analysis: the editors of the letters of Celine did what they felt good to give the "denial" of the author sufficient knowledge - I've never denied it - but it is unfortunate that they have not been included in this volume essential part where mention is made of " magic gas chamber. It is true that we would have probably heard the old Klarsfeld ...
He came to Ferdinand, who did not level, to identify with Christ. We certainly will go so far as to say that the case of the abolition of the official commemoration of his death is equivalent to a «remake of the Crucifixion. We do not dwell not that one of the greatest French writers, which is saying something , read and revered throughout the world, can be celebrated in his own country he loved and hated everything at a time - which is also very French. Rather, it asks if this is not a sinister posthumous victory.
I keep myself from making too many comments, I am content to hope some stakeholders, you will spot yourself who are too partisan to accept it, are found around a few drinks to flatten their agreements and disagreements. It is after all one of the tasks I'm trying to accomplish here in this Café du Commerce evoked by Michelangelo bow tie-Maffesoli. Special mention, let us also not overly booked, Alain de Benoist, that no one else on the plate was contradicted. And a reminder that this recent text by Jacques Rancière , which highlights very timely as the current racism, if the word racism has meaning, more recently, at present, to "high" than in "low".
And may God bless them - women ... God only knows why, hopefully he knows!
I know that we are in crisis, that things very serious may occur in coming months, as many French in drool: it's all true, but this is not the whole truth, that is, it always comes back, that humanity is a ceremony , that mankind does with the sacred, ritual, play, playfulness. Of course, we can consider that the cultural or religious differences are not important, that we are all alike, with two arms and two legs, etc.. And for all die - but that account, nothing is important, and it is shit like death, exactly. I cited the other day Cioran's words: "We should give up judging moral on anyone. Nobody is responsible for what is not and can not change its nature. This is obvious and everybody knows it. Why, then praise or slander? Because live is to evaluate, make it judgments, and that abstention , when it is not cowardice effect, requires an effort exhausting. "To live is to evaluate, compare, yell at each other, having fun. Very broadly and very simply : things are both important and unimportant, and we must take his party. Meaning: stop the shouting match on the grounds that all this ultimately has very little importance ... these are human depravity that clears some sand ... should be done at the last moment or at least as late as possible. It is healthy to step back, but we can not have all the time the view overlooking of God or indifference of the saint.
Let us through, so that our position is clear from the spirit represented here by us and by Alain Soral Equality and reconciliation : kill each other or eat your nose between communities in order to please some wealthy -who-are-the-already-too-and-who-want-the-becoming-even-more, yes, there is something depressing and that justifies making efforts to prevent the situation from still festering ... But we must keep in mind that even without the "professional dominance triangle", to borrow a phrase from A. Soral by applying it to our hand to all those who would divide and conquer, even without them, people yell at each other, be angry, and fortunately! - However, and here we reach this "spirit", one might think they would be more polite, at least most of the time, and it is actually that we should fight in this direction . This besides make some powerful shit, which at present are only sub-shit fuck donor lessons, is good for morale.
other words: it brings to the surface this argument of Wittgenstein that I had to play against Castoriadis, on the part of hypocrisy and Thurs (as playful, as in the sense where there is said of the game in a node eg leeway) in human beliefs: "It is true that a certain hypocrisy plays in there a role only insofar as, in general, it is easy to see almost everything that men do. " - This may seem inconsistent with the foregoing, it is not, it simply means that, according to Wittgenstein, people know well, somewhere, that "things are both important and not important" - and we add they know that people know - even to forget from time to time. (Who has visited one market to the former (I think from my side to Sicily) will see what that means: it's mouth around, with a smile, we are not fooled ... and at the same time the violence can occur when during a trading one or both parties begin to be dupes, in the moment.)
says it differently: what does is not because one does not adopt the position of the decadent aesthetic that looks at the destruction and massacres around him with some misanthropic joy, not because we are trying to avoid that massacres "free" to take place, we can ignore the one hand the potential of humanity to kill the other hand he is happy he is healthy, that humanity has this potential, even if it is indeed desirable that it does not update too often. I found again, and this is no accident, Battle of the sentence, "We need the system, and it takes the excess." They must work day and the cycles, the peaceful humanity, transmission, all that is beautiful in its own way and it's not me who spit on it, but it is also necessary, and it is necessary so that "all this "is beautiful, that mankind is also capable of excesses, extremes and attempts free - stupid if you will - and if humanity is capable, it is inevitable that it (is) proves intermittently.
Cioran quote again: "Given the other day Die in Madrid, the film about the civil war made up of excerpts and commentary. - The deployment of cruelty, rage on both sides, these summary executions, what a sight foolish, and what is worse, free! For all this seems to be designed for the amusement of the Devil. And more! If you could see on a screen the parade of nations, that is to say a lining of universal history, felt it not the same feeling of worthlessness, dementia vain and pathetic? "
Again: this is true, very true, it is not any truth (and also knows Cioran). - What I write more slowly than an individual I am peaceful, not a fighter for a penny, I had very few contacts in my life with violence, and if I know it's missing is a lack I make no effort to fill ...
Somehow, despite everything I just wrote, Nabe-Soral the quarrel is only a reflection of difference in positioning in the political struggle. If Nabe speak in its name, Equality and Reconciliation remains a political movement, and this account must have goals, giving directions: whether or not occasional Returns of Stalinism in his head is secondary to the fact that he must maintain a certain unity of principles and action. But this only refers to differences in personality, recalled by A. Soral itself spontaneously when explaining lie on the side of "us" rather than on the side of "I" (dichotomy also questionable since it also what can still be an "I" at the moment, but clear dichotomy in relation to what he means). And if the point which has given rise to this difference is September 11 and particularly the question of conspiracy theories in general, because M.-E. Nabe is in a position that allows him to accept uncertainty (which does not prevent him from having an opinion rather arrested on the subject), and it is more difficult for A. Soral.
This angle of view "to Bourdieu 'has been proposed, trying to synthesize all of the above. Again, the important thing is not to criticize Emmanuel Beau de Lomenie or Alain Soral and whether to have the right against them, that determine the limits of what underlies their diagnoses. The challenge is both to mark these boundaries and show the current importance of a movement like Equality and reconciliation, at least from his mind. I last spoke of "underlying materialism" and "egalitarianism prosaic. If the first expression seems clear, the second may require some clarification, now easy to make. Life is unequal is a commonplace that one can accept provided it does not take in the direction of its vulgate darwino-spencéro-nietzschéo-spenglerienne-vae-victis: life is unequal because people want it to be, because live is to assess (this only as a polemicist A. Soral not unlikely to forget ...). The 'prosaic egalitarianism "that bothers me here is the one who forget that people want in inequality because they want different and they are right to want the difference. - And at the same time, it is difficult to deny that we are in a period of rapid application of the principle of divide and rule "and that this may have consequences for many French - Coincidentally not the richest nor the most protected. From this point of view, anything that can remember how some dice are loaded is worth taking. Which is a bit short, is to believe, as seems to be Beau Lomenie in the text that I transcribed last week, that's enough, or even that it is a prerequisite. "The first job of reconstruction will be metaphysical," "The objective reality is not material in nature," it would not go away : because the buggers will fall he will be less easy load the dice in this case to use to his advantage that remains of culture religious humanity, which is still a peak. (Incidentally, I do not feel the need to analyze for itself the extreme-leftist thesis as what religion has always been used by the powerful to fuck the people, you see what I can blame him.)
Would it elsewhere for that, we would like September 11 has been what we initially thought it was an attack on both material and symbolic and metaphysical cons the Global Centre trade, not staging this attack by professional scriptwriting and advertising symbol. It would that genius symbolic (partly media, yes, of course, but what can I do?) has been on the side of non-bum (whatever one thinks of them elsewhere). We would without excessive enthusiasm, saying that it is always . - The future may tell ...
underground darkness lost buried next hour and the fate percussion paraben pure malt elucidation sudden and then not share angels illusory s time ended in yestarday Remember dazzled pulling the lip pale scarlet kills the throes transient insertion / deletion in the dark even about the meaning of combat
A Nabe course! Ally of the Zionist well known (the guy dares to believe that September 11 might not be handling US-Zionization), recently annoyed with Alain Soral, no doubt he has operated its levers occult LICRA, the CRIF and UEJF ... It's so clear!
Who doubts can only be an objective ally of the empire.
"Money, big money ..." - Genesis, limitations and ambiguities the "soral, I. - Nigger of the day, X and XI.
As recently came across two texts by authors who seem to be regarded as predecessors of Alain Soral, I enjoyed reading them both for themselves and to try to better understand the ins and outs of what seems to be a stream of ideas, but certainly not insignificant minority in the French political thought, at least since the mid-twentieth century.
Such exercises somehow devalues thinking on which it is carried out in that it diminishes the novelty. At the same time, it can better understand why attempts at political combat as they have failed in the past, and what, therefore, possibly, could give them more chances of success in the future.
I give you today the first of these texts, with some feedback ... that I will interrupt abruptly. This will give a partial aspect of my analysis on elements of A. Soral, but besides that I was getting a little long, so I went off in generalities that I feel need to be treated separately.
Moreover, I learned this morning the history of the complaint against A. UEJF Soral. The relationship of it to Jews is in some way, unnecessarily complicated, I thought a few times to dig myself without hitch. In other words, I do not know if it's an interesting question. We found some traces implicit in what follows.
- A small distraction to begin
and away!
"I have objected to both right and left: your comments are not without interest, but you place yourself at a point of view too exclusively economic and social development. You do not consider to explain our current weaknesses and confusion, that malfeasance caused by abuse and monopoly of a few large power business. You plan to prepare a remedy, the problem of social class structure. You neglect the disorders caused by the mechanism ill suited for our constitutional institutions. You seem to ignore you even ideologies, philosophical beliefs opposed by which, for many people, to whatever class they belong, differ Right mindset and mentality of the Left.
To this I reply: I am aware nor neglects the constitutional views and ideologies. But I want to avoid confusion, I want to put the concerns in their normal order of urgency.
I know very well that, initially, in France's parliamentary nineteenth century, in relation to constitutional positions and ideological formulas above, almost exclusively even in appearance, that has set the opposition between Right and Left. Under the Restoration those who claimed the Left is recommended primarily for what they called the liberal formulas from doctrines of 89, those who sit right in the meetings said they were primarily loyal to the moral traditions of the old monarchy, which, over the ages, had ensured the continuity of its size, influence and civilizing work of France .
Later, in the aftermath of the Franco-Prussian War, when the Assembly elected in 1871 he was fixing the new regime to give the country the distinction had appeared even clearer and more explicit constitutional. Right, in principle, it was the royalists. The Left, it was the Republicans.
It was also natural that the concerns Constitutional tinssent then a dominant since the country was without a defined status and it was to give her one. Already, however, behind the labels strictly political confusion of a very different lurked. While some called for the republic was in principle because republic democracy meant to them, that is to say government of the people by the people, government by the people in the interest of the masses to free them from this that called doctrinaire domination of the powerful selfish and abusive, and also ensured they, the domination of the Church which, they argued, for ensure his own power, based itself on material powers.
But in reality, very quickly, a number of economically and financially more powerful had realized that to save, at least temporarily, their positions threatened, it could be advantageous to exploit the misunderstanding that the constitutional debates and ideological shape of the plan could give rise. Indeed, if for various doctrinaire republic, identified by them with democracy, was the defense and prosperity of the oppressed masses, for many people, even in very popular republican form, historically linked to the bloody adventures and disorders of the first and second republic was then mainly instability, disorder and misery, disorder, misery and instability with the little people were the main victims . The monarchy against them was a regime where the sovereign arbiter between all could and should be in its own interest as well as in the general interest, the defender of the weak against the monopolies and the ambitions of dominating better off.
As a result, as the word republic continued to inspire great fear, as the doctrinaire Democrats knew they had the country behind them in a relatively small minority, some of the economically powerful groups and themselves at risk, as well as the side of the monarchists on the Republican side doctrinaire Democrats , had devised a clever combination. They had made an alliance with the Democrats, knowing that for now the weakest, were less demanding, to neutralize them. They give, as a diversion, the republican form of government, ideology anticlerical and a number of places. In return they would not too demanding reforms in economic structure and revision of large financial abuse.
This had facilitated the game is that all the great riders did not make the same calculation. Some of them, even in large numbers at the start, had seen in the combination of rallying to the republic danger. They had refused to join. Because they thought the republic was bound to fall one day into demagoguery ruinous interest. This reflex, loudly said, gave the naive impression that the Democrats rallied, which, themselves, hid their calculation were selfless idealists. We forgave them their fortunes because of the generosity their rally: they avoided asking for the immediate sacrifice of money, they even let the system take a lot of places, openly or concealed leadership, time that, by their rally, they allowed the republic to live.
They drew from all this are twofold. By joining forces with the republic, that is to say, according to the formulas of the moment, the Left, they saved at least temporarily their privileged economic position. And at the same time they located the belief in the opinion incorrect, but convenient for them, that the privileged money were right on the side of opponents of the republic.
Indeed, subsequently, the operation could not proceed smoothly. After a while, once the system is installed, the Democratic doctrine had begun to be more demanding. They had not fully satisfied with the two derivative forms of republican constitution and ideology anticlerical. A socialist party that had organized called for the masses, for masses of workers especially, economic reforms and social structure. So great had rallied threatened more or less discreetly returned to the Right and towards the Church, but without any real intention of letting the storm pass until one day the naive doctrinaire Democrats to save what they considered essential, and most directly threatened, that is to say, the constitutional forms and ideology anticlerical republican, had again agreed to abandon temporarily the structural reforms.
short (that is, in my view, the dominant notion that, having never been clearly analyzed before me has clouded any contemporary French life), it is not true, as some people naively believe , Like other far more Machiavellian applied themselves to believe, that the Right is or has France been the party of money. Money, big money is, was neither to right nor left. To save the most unfair advantages he has consistently played alternately by the Left and Right, most often of the Left, by exploiting a number of ideologies.
is misleading ambiguity has always maintained that in this respect, it is the alternating swings he used to save his excessive privileges that were primarily responsible for the continuing instability government and institutional whose contemporary France has ceased to suffer. It is these swings as a result are also primarily responsible for the weakening of the French international authority, depressing the confusion which this loss of prestige hurts the French and the resulting loss of dynamism and entrepreneurship that accuse us both now. "
These lines (reproduced without cuts, I only corrected the punctuation here and there) was written in 1956 by Emmanuel Beau de Lomenie, and published in the journal edited by Jacques Laurent , La Parisienne (No special "The Right", October 1956).
Beau Lomenie is mainly known for two books, a great history of Responsibilities bourgeois dynasties, five volumes published between 1943 and Denoël 1973, and an annotated anthology of the work of Drumont Edward Drumont or National anticapitalism , edited by Pauvert (and J.-F. Revel, render unto Caesar ...) in 1968.
If we can only hope that his work as a historian is documented more than a few lines of synthesis, too allusive, we salute the relevance of these, and we underline appearance pre-soralien: refusal of dogmatism separation Left-Right, Marxist concern audit in the concrete of the validity of separations political will for reconciliation between the French, spell out the following text, which is like a foreshadowing of certain aspects of the Gaullist regime. All accompanied by an interest in stateless powers, including the Jewish power. (Note that in the introduction to his book on Drumont Beau Lomenie estimated Jewish France is the worst text of his author's attention it was too exclusively focused on the Jews and not allowing understand the real issues of alliances between big capitalists. I only read the introduction.) These common with the founder of Equity and Reconciliation seem striking in that other extract (I practice a few cuts, to stay on key):
"Currently In France, outside the narrow minority more or less directly related to major business interests, which are maintained or even strengthened by their occult fact alternated games, there are two large masses roughly comparable numerical size.
There is a mass of workers and employees base, most of which have little resources other than their salaries. For them, because of democratic formulas that from the beginning, the doctrinaire Republicans were linked to the label on the left, left, and that meant much attention to the people, belonging to the left has become, in a spirit of class a kind of dogma. But as the same time, since its inception, have continued to figure in the parliamentary coalitions of left some of the representatives or agents of big business and politics embraced democratic forms in word to sleep or to neutralize the claims and the impatience of the most menacing; as in more recent times we have seen yet included in government with labels left men also marked by their big business affiliations that René Mayer, cousin and avowed agent of the Rothschilds, or even now, with the title of Secretary of State for the Budget, Mr. John Filippi , passed in the staffs of the house of Louis-Dreyfus, major traffickers of wheat and Shipping, then, without understanding the mechanism of such combinations, the working masses have confused the feeling of being deceived. And so much of them, giving up hope of finding their place quietly within the French community, look to Moscow.
Faced with this mass-based employee working there is the vast mass of middle class-based artisans, shopkeepers, farmers and much of intellectuals from the so-called liberal professions.
is this middle class that was quickly found, which is now more than ever the main victim of misunderstandings fostered by the great powers business. In principle, the kind of activities that are often independent character and Business, through its family relationships sometimes, it should have been sustained and supported by business leaders. In fact, most often, the latter, especially concerned to protect their positions and threatened their privileges to both viewpoints abusive, did nothing to help and sustain the spirit of initiative, dynamism producer of these middle managers. Quite the contrary, concerned above all to exclude potential competitors, reserving to themselves the credit facility, pumping systems by false promises of responsible borrowing the savings of these potential rivals, they have gradually methodically and somewhat depressed. And, to divert their instinctive revolt, they have with them better and even more easily with the masses of workers, played misunderstandings ideological dividing them.
So spoke, the more comfortable and maintenance of the worst abuses unhealthy economic cutting of small and middle bourgeoisie between a Republican and radical left and right unparliamentary, so busy arguing about the shape of institutions and the religious problem that they forget their interests as their social responsibilities and the common development of economic and financial program related to the joint role that should be theirs in all the French activities.
Imagine instead that the sick game that has maintained and grown its divisions has been understood by her. Instead of wear in its theoretical arguments it would naturally have to take the initiative to organize a program of all individual generating initiatives. It would not condemn the principle of large fortunes and large enterprises. It would control them, through among other things, the orderly distribution of credit, to bend to the common good. Well understood and the program, which would normally be that of a new right would also be sanitized the formation of a new Left, on sound and consistent.
New Left counter our new Right, issued riots prompted by the hypocrisy of the current leftist coalition, would be less inclined to undergo the attraction of communism Muscovite, even this kind of latent hatred for our national past that we can guess at some of the doctrinal Current MRP who want the left.
Then the parliamentary game could work in a balanced way, with two major groupings consistent enough to allow the establishment of social programs and national assembly. And the false equivocation that contributed so much to the demoralization common being eliminated, the debates on institutional reform, discussions about the religious policy could take in an atmosphere that would not quarrel over the passions artificially maintained and irritated.
If indeed it is normal for different interests to get organized in their confrontation with a balance, it is unhealthy that the active forces of the country are regimented in a sustainable manner into factions grouped on programs whose main themes, consisting to keep challenging question the essential foundations of our national life and morals, maintain a mentality of continuous civil war. "
" When strikes the hour an ideology, while contributing to its success, his enemies themselves ... " - you can see once again the validity of that adage Cioran, as the regime that emerged in the years following the drafting of This article has filled in some respects the wishes of Beau Lomenie, in other respects has strengthened the weight of the large capitalist groups compared to that of SMEs and the "middle class".
Do not push parallels between the authors and between periods too far, but found an ambiguity here that I happened to mention on the side "restorer of capitalism" Alain Soral. There are three reasons for this seems to me there, and if the first two: the incredible power of recovery and recycling of capitalism, its undeniable trend towards self-destruction, which means that those who fight against it tend trying to save him from himself - if the first two are external factors and heavy at the thought of E. Beau Lomenie or A. Soral, the third refers to the internal coherence of their discourse and impulses of economic reductionism that we can detect.
Somewhere in her latest video Alain Soral epilogue on the rich Muslims Neuilly who get thick as thieves with the Zionists and cathos corner without religion will make the slightest obstacle. I have written things like this, I still subscribe to that view. I am also fully agree with the analysis on the strategy of "divide and conquer." Anything that can show in the line of about Beau Lomenie, some how, while pretending to argue, agree so hidden on the backs of the poor, is good to know, because, quite simply, true. Finally, I maintain a work habit of the French from diverse backgrounds together to done overnight, at school, at work for those who do, etc.. - Unless indeed the anthropological type that comes out is necessarily exciting, but that's another matter. Suffice to say that I find myself in a friendly country in these texts.
This can only impede, however, is a kind of naive Marxist theoretical strategies inseparable unveiling say, as if, once they had demonstrated the artificiality of certain disputes, they would s 'vanish of themselves. Try here to distinguish what should be:
- and despite his side with Don Quixote, Alain Soral itself is not, humanly speaking, a naive - probably at the point of depressing its aficionados certain statements by some moody or cynical;
- strictly speaking, Marxism (or other strategy of unveiling, Freudianism) n not imply that the discovery of some hidden structures of domination automatically the disappearance of these structures;
- yet there is in all these theories a kind of underestimation due to cultural differences in materialism- Underlying that while having a fund actually generate their own illusions. These illusions
may be practical, receipt of these theories: the belief in the amateur of Equality and reconciliation if all the poor will reach out to all the best in the best of France, etc.. - Loaded for those who know it's not so easy to remember, to make lucid Billancourt, so to speak;
these illusions are also derived from a prosaic egalitarianism that can seems to me he detect in Soral, or otherwise, in Bourdieu. Here we find elsewhere, from another angle, the recent quarrel between Soral and M.-E. Nabe. The first looks like the second it is a aesthetic philistine or something like that, it remains there in whichever is the sense of an artist the beauty of the variety of human affairs that we do not feel the same degree at Alain Soral .
Here s'atteignirent the Athenians, and that I stop. The logical analysis of these leads, as I mentioned in the preamble to generalities that need their own space to be expressed with the precision which alone can enable them not add to banalities. To thank those who have gone through this text, a small reward - to watch over, the Godfather himself is through.
