"We can not put anything in structure or in any way, any more than we can achieve any wedding ... Most structuralists use the word" structures "in the plural This is a major alienation. Since all fantasies are possible and we fall into a licentiousness probably different from the banal poetry but is nonetheless a shamelessness. The real issue is elsewhere not pose the problem of communication in itself, even in a dialectical form, but to grasp if we can find a partner, that is to say, a pole structure according to its own polarity, and in this case a woman can receive his message and issue in exchange for hers. That is the real problem. Deal with communication in the concrete and not in the abstract ...
- should be found to be sufficiently responsive to capture what you are talking about radiation.
Both receptive and radiating themselves, for there to be exchange, exchange and clear.
- Basically, it falls in your issue of secret societies.
If you want. The secret society was created to bring transparency in a small group of men. The world itself, in its entirety, is opaque. It then tries to isolate a small transparent area in the middle of the opacity of the world. But the secret society the most basic and most transparent is still a couple, if it is successful.
- Here we find the notion of what is called, in Christianity, the "next".
Strictly speaking, because anyone is sensitive to the ineffable, every being is my neighbor. But this is a problem of choice arises, which is, incidentally, the drama of Christianity. Democratic by his mystique, he is an aristocrat by his gnosis, and he can not keep it together. Similarly, in love, every man who can not progress does not become selective.
[AMG: which should not be understood solely in terms of outward appearance, far from it. Nabe said that it was expanding its maturing preferences, we no longer content to only one type of woman. I agree, but precisely: preferences "purely physical" may be more diverse than forty years at sixteen, when you think love only small brown to blue, but this diversity includes, or may include a search deeper and more selective for a specific type of woman whose existence is felt at such and such, across different forms of beauty. ]
Under its concrete aspect, the problem of communication arises as well: What will find Margaret before him (and him) the new Faust? I have always been driven by this concept intuitively, more or less conscious, the next was something rare and difficult to reach and that the next really meant something in the religious literature: it was and what the next n was not all men will require developing different levels, different concentric circles to cross. And, again, is that sexual love is, in this respect as many others, the key experience as communication, then, is posited as enigma and mystery like, and we understand or we do not understand! Love is extremely selective! It is selective in nature when he wants really well done!
I do not believe in the power of love for humanity absolutely undifferentiated global and indistinct. I do not want to have sex with any woman, and I flatter myself! I do not see this as a sign of impotence. Instead, I take it as a sign of strength that will actual knowledge of the rules of this selectivity, and verification of their value in the very act. Love is above all a means to qualify and on-call energy, both on one side than the other!
- It then ends up arriving at a certain infallibility?
No! It is never infallible, because the body is never fully known and understood. The body may still betray you at any moment, even the body is what gives you away permanently, if pushed to the extreme of what we want it to be! I would even say that eroticism in its better definition, consists of all revenue to push the body not to betray, to reduce the limit where this is treason, and even to hide this treachery to weak consciences. Any erotic literature is basically a compilation of resources that range from more physical than spiritual, the bite and kiss through the spell intellectual, but are all part of a group whose sexual act is, if you want to, integration. But beyond these recipes that love also reinvents and adjusts at best, there is an exchange problem with this adjustment, in the moment, indicates that it is every Once a new problem. Through the various women in our experience, we seek not the ideal woman, but the essence of utmost femininity. Where is it and that we waiting? Is it everywhere or is it just anywhere? And what do we become if we find it? Everything is there. "
Abellio R., 1966. (I just retouched the beginning of the text for clarity.)
0 comments:
Post a Comment